1
$\begingroup$

In a hypothetical 2+1D universe:

  • if we apply the Newtonian concept of gravity, we might expect that the gravitational force between two mass points with a distance of $r$ would diminish linearly with distance proportional $1/r$, however,

  • if we would apply Einstein's general relativity theory, we might expect that in 2+1D spacetime, the Einstein tensor vanishes identically because of the mathematical characteristics of the Ricci curvature tensor and the Ricci scalar in 2+1D.

The two concepts, appear to me somewhat paradoxical. My question is:

  • whether my interpretations of Newton's and Einstein's laws for gravity for 2+1D are incorrect? or

  • if they are correct, then how can the two concepts be harmonized,

to answering the question of the existence and propagation of gravity in a 2+1D universe.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate: Gravity in 2+1D spacetime and inverse linear law More on GR in 2+1D. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented May 1 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic thank you for helping to clarify. $\endgroup$ Commented May 1 at 13:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In (2+1)D, the Weyl tensor vanishes identically. The Einstein tensor is completely fixed by the Einstein equations. In (1+1)D the Einstein tensor vanishes identically. $\endgroup$ Commented May 1 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ inspirehep.net/literature/192056 $\endgroup$
    – TimRias
    Commented May 1 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ @NíckolasAlves But the Ricci scalar causes cancellation of the terms when calculating the Einstein tensor in 2+1D; or am I wrong: 1/2 R G- 1/2 R G? $\endgroup$ Commented May 1 at 18:10

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In (2+1)D, it is a geometrical fact that the Weyl tensor vanishes. The Einstein tensor and the Ricci tensor give then all of the independent components of the Riemann tensor, and they are fully specified algebraically by the Einstein field equations. In particular, a consequence of this is that in (2+1)D gravity does not propagate: there is only curvature in points in spacetime which contain matter. Hence, the Earth would not orbit the Sun in a (2+1)D universe. The Einstein tensor can still be non-vanishing, and a common example is the BTZ black hole.

As far as I know, the Newtonian scenario is very different, and gravity indeed propagates (although I do not know from memory the specific expression for the gravitational force). Notice this means that GR does not reduce to Newtonian gravity in (2+1)D. To my knowledge, these two points of view cannot be reconciled in a straightforward manner. Perhaps something can be achieved with Newton–Cartan theory, but I'm not sufficiently familiar with its properties in (2+1)D to make useful comments about it.

In (1+1)D the Einstein tensor vanishes identically, and thus the Einstein equations reduce to stating that the stress tensor must too vanish identically. Hence, you can't have matter in these spacetimes (unless the stress tensor of the matter cancels exactly).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.