2
$\begingroup$

One part of Distance conjecture states that free theory (Higher spin) are at infinite distance away from any arbitrary point on conformal manifold where the distance is measured with respect to Zamolodchikov metric. For example in Yang Mills theory the marginal operator is the lagrangian itself. So if I do a naive distance estimate like following: $$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{g^2}F^2+\frac{dg}{g^3}F^2$$ then the metric is $\langle\frac{dg}{g^3}F^2\frac{dg}{g^3}F^2\rangle$ with the kinematic factors stripped off. Now to first order the metric goes like $\frac{(dg)^2}{g^6}\langle F^2F^2\rangle \approx \frac{(dg)^2}{g^6} g^4$ since $F \sim (\partial A)^2$, each propagator gives $g^2$ and we have two contraction. Therefore $g=0$ is an infinite distance away point as distance goes like $\log g$.

Now doing same bookkeeping for $\phi^4$ theory tells me free theory is at finite distance $$\mathcal{L} = (\partial \phi)^2+\lambda\phi^4$$ The metric turns will be $\langle d\lambda \phi^4d\lambda \phi^4\rangle \sim d\lambda^2$ so $\lambda=0$ is not infinite distance away point.

I can't figure what stupidity I'm doing in my argument.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Are you following a reference? arXiv:2011.10040? Which page? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 17 at 21:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There isn't a conformal manifold for $\phi^4$, so what's the question? (For YM you can at least imagine that you're working with $N=4$) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19 at 12:54

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.