1
$\begingroup$

In the unnumbered equation above (8) the authors of https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05547 introduce a free parameter $m_x$ (presumably of mass dimension), when switching from the real scalar field $\phi$ (discretized on a spatial lattice) to creation operators:

$$ \phi(x)= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2m_x}}(a_x+a^\dagger_x). $$

They say then that the commutation relation between the creation/annihilation operators are $$[a_x,a^\dagger_y]=a^{-1}\delta_{x,y}.$$ How can this commutation relation not be affected by $m_x$, given the fixed commutation relation between the fields from the unnumbered equation above (1), $$[\phi(x),\pi(x)]=ia^{-1}\delta_{x,y}~?$$ (This seems correct from the dimensional analysis perspective.)

I'm also wondering whether $m_x$ can actually explicitly depend on $x$, similarly to $\omega_{\bf k}$ in the momentum space.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It should be fine as long as you put the right normalization in $\pi$. If one takes $$\pi(x) = i\sqrt{\frac{m_x}{2}} (a_x^\dagger - a_x)$$ then everything works out.

In general, you can always add a scaling factor like this in front of your creation and annihilation operators without changing the canonical commutation relations. What it does change is a prefactor in your Hamiltonian which depends on the scale.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.