1
$\begingroup$

Fermi (Quantum Theory of Radiation 1932), using the electromagnetic energy expression $W_e$, a new variable $v_s$ is derived in equation: $$v_s=\frac{\partial W_e}{\partial \dot{u}_s}$$ which is canonically conjugate to $u_s$ (generalized position variable).

I'm not sure how he did that. What I understand is that, from a Lagrangian $L=T-V$, a canonical conjugate momenta can be obtained by: $$p_s=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_s}$$ But, unlike $W_e$, Lagrangian $L$ is not total energy. Then why did Fermi say "by means of usual rules" in arriving the result. Please help!

His paper is given below:

Fermi 1932: "Quantum Theory of Radiation"

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Provided $V$ is independent of $\dot{q}$ and $H = T + V$ then $\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{q}} = \frac{\partial T}{\partial\dot{q}} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial\dot{q}}$, but most normally we need $p$ to define $H$ as a function of $(q,p)$ so we define $p$ in terms of $L$ $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 22 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ But there is not mention of $V$ in the paper. So, it is unusual to me. Or is there some other work that is analogous to this derivation by Fermi? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ The "potential" $V$ is the part that is analogous to $\frac{1}{2}kx^2$ for the simple harmonic oscillator. I.e., Fermi's potential $V$ is $\sum_s \frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2}2\pi^2\nu_s^2 u_s^2$. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Mar 6 at 20:43

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Consider the Lagrangian for a simple harmonic oscillator, written in terms of its "natural" variables, position $x$ and velocity $\textrm{v}$: $$ L(x, \textrm{v}) = \frac{1}{2}m\textrm{v}^2 - \frac{1}{2}kx^2\;. $$

We can construct another quantity, also a function of $x$ and $\textrm{v}$, which I will call the "velocity form of the energy" $W$: $$ W(x, \textrm{v}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \textrm{v}}\textrm{v} - L \tag{A} $$ $$= \frac{1}{2}m\textrm{v}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2\;. $$ Note that $W$ is of interest since $W(x(t),\dot x(t))$ is constant in time when $x(t)$ is the true classical path.

This thing I'm calling the "velocity form of the energy" $W$ is also called the "Hamiltonian" $H$, when written as a function of the position $x$ and momentum $p$.

The definition of the momentum, $p$, is: $$ p \equiv \frac{\partial L}{\partial \textrm{v}} = \frac{\partial W}{\partial \textrm{v}} = m\textrm{v}\;. $$ The second equality follows from the fact that $x$ and $\textrm{v}$ are independent variables and the further requirement that the kinetic energy is a quadradic function of the velocity. (See section below for more details about this.)


In more detail, given a kinetic energy, $T(\textrm{v})$, and a potential energy, $U(x)$, we have: $$ p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \textrm{v}}=\frac{\partial }{\partial \textrm{v}}\left(T(\textrm{v}) - U(\textrm{x})\right) $$ $$ =\frac{\partial T}{\partial \textrm{v}}\;. $$

We also have, by the definition in Eq. (A) above of the velocity form of the energy, $$ \frac{\partial W}{\partial \textrm{v}} = \textrm{v}\frac{\partial^2 L}{\partial \textrm{v}^2} = \textrm{v}\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial \textrm{v}^2}\;. $$

If $T(\textrm{v})$ is a homogeneous power of $\textrm{v}$, we can write $$ T = av^b\;, $$ where $a$ and $b$ are constants and $a$ is not zero. We thus have $$ \frac{\partial T}{\partial \textrm{v}} = abv^{(b-1)}\tag{1} $$ and $$ \textrm{v}\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial \textrm{v}^2} = ab(b-1)v^{(b-1)}\tag{2} $$ and we have equality of the right-hand sides of Eqs. (1) and (2) when either $b=0$ (which is not interesting) or when $$ b=2\;, $$ which is typical for a kinetic energy term.


Given our expression for $p(\textrm{v})=m\textrm{v}$, we can invert the expression to find $\textrm{v}(p) = p/m$, and we can write the Hamiltonian energy as: $$ H(x, p) = W(x, \textrm{v}(p)) = \frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}kx^2\;. $$

This is "all" that Fermi has done, since Fermi's system is "just" a collection of uncoupled simple harmonic oscillators. So, he is just working in complete analogy to the simple harmonic oscillator.


In other words, for each mode, labeled by $s$, in the expression $$ W_e = \frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2}\sum_s \left(\frac{1}{2}\dot u_s^2 + 2\pi^2\nu_s^2 u_s^2\right) $$ we can make the following identifications, in analogy to the first section of this answer: $$ \dot u_s \to \textrm{v}_s $$ $$ u_s \to x_s $$ $$ \frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2} \to m_s $$ and $$ \frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2}4\pi^2\nu_s^2 \to k_s\;, $$ in which case we have, by the definitions above, the velocity form of the energy: $$ W_e(x_1,\ldots,\textrm{v}_N) = \sum_s \frac{1}{2}m_s \textrm{v}_s^2 + \frac{1}{2}k_s x_s^2 $$

And, also in analogy to the first section of this answer, we can make the identifications: $$ p = \frac{\partial W}{\partial \textrm{v}}\to p_s = \frac{\partial W_e}{\partial \dot u_s}=\frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2}\dot u_s = m_s \textrm{v}_s $$

Now, by substituting into the velocity form $W_e(x_1,\ldots,\textrm{v}_N)$ with $v_s(p_s)$ for $v_s$ we arrive at the Hamiltonian form of the energy (Fermi uses the same symbol $W_e$ for it): $$ W_e(x_1,\ldots,p_N) = \sum_s \frac{p_s^2}{2m_s}+\frac{1}{2}k_s x_s^2 =\sum_s \underbrace{\frac{8\pi^2 c^2}{\Omega}}_{1/m_s}\frac{p_s^2}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\underbrace{\frac{\Omega}{8\pi c^2}4\pi^2\nu_s^2}_{k_s} u_s^2\;, $$ which is what Fermi arrived at. (Note that Fermi used a more-curly "$v$" symbol for momentum instead of the "$p$" symbol I am using. I find the more curly "$v$" to be a little confusing here, since such a symbol is often used for velocity (rather than momentum) and also it looks fairly similar to Fermi's "nu" symbol $\nu$. So, I am using the symbol $p_s$ for the momentum of a mode, and I am using a non-curly $\textrm{v}_s$ for velocity.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.