4
$\begingroup$

For a bipartite system: $\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{H}_{a}\otimes\mathcal{H}_{b}$ described by a density operator $\hat{\rho}_{ab}$, I can promote it to a vector in the Liouville space, $|\hat{\rho}_{ab}\rangle\rangle$. The Schmidt decomposition for such a vector would be: $$ |\hat{\rho}_{ab}\rangle\rangle=\sum_{n}\gamma_{n}|\hat{\sigma}_{n}\rangle\rangle\otimes|\hat{\tau}_{n}\rangle\rangle $$ where $\{|\hat{\sigma}_{n}\rangle\rangle\}$ and $\{|\hat{\tau}_{n}\rangle\rangle\}$ will be orthonormal (in terms of the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product) basis of $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{H}_{a})$ and $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{H}_{b})$ respectively. Is there any argument to relate those bases to the physical reduced density matrix for the subsystems A and B?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you clarify what kind of relation you envision? You mean similar as the Schmidt basis is the eigenbasis of the reduced density matrix? You could define a "super-reduced density matrix" (or reduced super-density-matrix?) and make an analogous statement, of course. $\endgroup$ Jan 31 at 9:27
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking that since the linear state vector space, the linear superoperator space and the Liouville space are isomorphic there must be some relationship between the "super-reduced density matrix" and the reduced density matrix acting on the state vector space. However I cannot see the physical differences between them. Could it be possible that the reduced density matrix captures the quantum dynamics of the subsystem state by itself, while the "super-reduced density matrix" captures the dynamics of the same subsystem within a larger framework of the joint system? $\endgroup$
    – Oscarcillo
    Feb 6 at 12:50

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I don't think there's any general relation to be found here, and my argument is the entangled (as easily seen via PPT) state $$ \rho=\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & 0 & \frac{1}{8} & \frac{1}{8} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{8} & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{8} \\ \frac{1}{8} & 0 & \frac{1}{8} & \frac{1}{4} \end{pmatrix} $$ Applying the Schmidt decomposition to the vectorized state $|\rho\rangle\!\rangle$ yields $$ |\rho\rangle\!\rangle=\frac58|\sigma_1\rangle\!\rangle\otimes|\tau_1\rangle\!\rangle+\frac14|\sigma_2\rangle\!\rangle\otimes|\tau_2\rangle\!\rangle+\frac18|\sigma_3\rangle\!\rangle\otimes|\tau_3\rangle\!\rangle $$ with \begin{align*} |\sigma_1\rangle\!\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\\0\\\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\\\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\end{pmatrix}=|\tau_1\rangle\!\rangle\quad ,\quad |\sigma_2\rangle\!\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\\0\\\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\\\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}=|\tau_2\rangle\!\rangle\quad ,\quad |\sigma_3\rangle\!\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\end{pmatrix}= |\tau_3\rangle\!\rangle\,. \end{align*} Now the reduced states of $\rho$ read $$ {\rm tr}_A(\rho)=\begin{pmatrix} \frac{3}{4} & \frac{1}{8} \\ \frac{1}{8} & \frac{1}{4} \end{pmatrix}\quad\text{ and }\quad {\rm tr}_B(\rho)=\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{8} \\ \frac{1}{8} & \frac{1}{2} \end{pmatrix} $$ but $|\sigma_j\rangle\!\rangle,|\tau_j\rangle\!\rangle$ all feature a zero entry and, more gravely, the same holds true for any linear combination of these vectors. Thus neither $|{\rm tr}_A(\rho)\rangle\!\rangle$ nor $|{\rm tr}_B(\rho)\rangle\!\rangle$ can be expressed (linearly) using the Schmidt basis vectors $|\sigma_j\rangle\!\rangle,|\tau_j\rangle\!\rangle$.

$\endgroup$
1

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.