0
$\begingroup$

I am working through d'Alembert's solution to the 1+1D wave equation using the substitution of canonical coordinates. I have an initial condition of: $$u_{t}(x,0) = g(x) $$ with a general solution containing the following two arbitrary functions: $$u(x,t) = \phi(x-ct) + \psi(x+ct)$$ These two functions are composite functions. I know I am supposed to take the partial derivative with respect to $t$ and set it equal to $g(x)$ to get the following: $$-c\phi'(x) + c\psi'(x) = g(x)$$ The book provides the above prime notation and does not specify what $\phi$ & $\psi$ are being differentiated by. The issue is the next step in the solution states to carry out the integration from $x_0$ to $x$ to obtain: $$ -c\phi(x) + c\psi(x) = \int^{x}_{x_0}g(\xi)d\xi +K$$ I believe my issue comes from correctly differentiating the composite function. At first I tried to just take the partial derivative with respect to $t$, setting $t=0$, and got the following: $$-c\frac{\partial{\phi(x)}}{\partial{t}} +c\frac{\partial{\psi(x)}}{\partial{t}} = g(x)$$ When I then integrate with respect to $x$ (the only way to make the integral of $g(\xi)$ make sense), I get the following: $$-c\int\frac{\partial{\phi(x)}}{\partial{t}}d(x) + ...$$ which doesn't make sense to me. So I then looked into if I was doing the partial derivative of the composite function incorrectly. I found some general texts online about derivatives of composite functions and got this: $$ h = g(f(x_1,x_2)) = g(u_1(x_1,x_2),u_2(x_1,x_2))$$ And using the chain rule for composite functions: $$\frac{\partial h}{\partial x_1} = \frac{\partial h}{\partial u_1} * \frac{\partial u_1}{\partial x_1} + \frac{\partial h}{\partial u_2} * \frac{\partial u_2}{\partial x_1} $$ When I try to apply it to the problem, I get the following: $$ u(x,t) = g(f(x,t)) = g(\phi(x,t),\psi(x,t))$$ with the following derivative with respect to $t$: $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi} * \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial \psi} * \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}$$ which simplifies to (might be incorrect): $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = -c * \frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi} + c * \frac{\partial u}{\partial \psi}$$ I don't know how to find $ \frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi}$ or $ \frac{\partial u}{\partial \psi}$ and those derivatives don't make sense when I try to integrate with respect to $x$: $$-c\int\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{\phi}}d(x) + ...$$ Can anyone show me where I am making a mistake in my understanding, and how to correctly differentiate $u(x,t) = \phi(x-ct) + \psi(x+ct)$ to get it into the correct form to where I can integrate with respect to $x$? Thank you!

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ > "The book provides the above prime notation and does not specify what $\phi$ & $\psi$ are being differentiated by." No, you are misunderstanding this very much. Both functions are 1-variable functions; it just so happens that the one variable that they are functions thereof, are themselves a linear function of two variables. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ The wiki does a better job of defining new variables so that $x$ isn't of questionable identity. $\endgroup$
    – user121330
    Commented Jan 3 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you everyone for your comments. I understand now! $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 20:04

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

It is possible to understand $\phi (x-ct)=\phi (\xi (t))$ and $\psi(x+ct)=\psi (\xi (t))$, where $\xi(t)=x-ct$; to get:$$u_t(x,0)={\partial\over\partial t}\phi (\xi(t))\bigg |_{t=0}+{\partial\over\partial t}\psi(\xi(t))\bigg |_{t=0}=g(\xi(t))\bigg |_{t=0}.$$Applying the chain rule one gets: $${\partial\over\partial t}\phi (\xi(t))+{\partial\over\partial t}\psi (\xi(t))={\partial\phi\over\partial \xi}{\partial\xi\over\partial t}+{\partial\psi\over\partial\xi}{\partial\xi\over\partial t}$$ Hence, $$u_t(x,0)=-c{\partial\phi\over\partial\xi}+c{\partial\psi\over\partial\xi}=g(\xi)$$ Integrating with respect to $\xi$ gives:$$-c\phi (\xi)+c\psi (\xi)=\int_{x_0}^xg(\xi)\;d\xi\;+K.$$ Where $K$ is a constant of integration from the right hand side that has been moved over. Now since we have set $t=0$ it is clear that $\xi(0)=x$ which when substituted into the above expression gives the result as per the textbook you have been consulting.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.