I understand that Noether's Theorem has a Hamiltonian form, whereby {X, H} = 0 iff {H, X} = 0.
The proof of this is trivial, as it follows from the antisymmetry of the Poisson Brackets.
First question:
It remains a question on my mind whether every symmetry, which transforms q(t) into q(t) + k(q(t)) truly has a representation as X(q,p) on the phase space.
In the Butterfield paper, they rely on recitfication to make q a cyclic coordinate, in which case the problem is trivial. Is there an easier way to see it in the general case?
Second question:
What about general non-symmetry transformations? Do they always have a representation X(q,p) on phase space? In other words, suppose I have a know L(q, q'), and p(q, q').
Suppose I define a transformation that changes q(t) into q(t) + k(q(t)), and therefore changes q'(t) into q'(t) + q'(t)dk/dq. Does there exist a corresponding X(q, p) on phase space such that dX/dq = -k(q) and dX/dp = q'(t) dk/dq (after changing variables from q' to p)