10
$\begingroup$

in Peskin Schroeder after the derivation of the differential cross section there is a comment for the central mass system (CMS), which says:

In the special case, where all four particles have identical masses (...), this [the general formula] reduces to the formula[...] (p.107): $$ \left(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right)_{CM}=\frac{\left|\mathcal{M}\right|^2}{64\pi^2E_{CM}^2}$$ However in Srednicki the general formula for the differential cross section in the CMS is (p.97): $$\left(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right)_{CM}=\frac{\left|\mathcal{M}\right|^2}{64\pi^2E_{CM}^2}\frac{\left|\textbf{k}^\prime\right|}{\left|\textbf{k}\right|} $$ where $\left|\textbf{k}^\prime\right|$ is the outgoing three-momentum in the CMS and $\left|\textbf{k}\right|$ the incoming. Now to get from the formula from Srednicki to Peskin's formula I don't need the masses to be all the same but merely the incoming masses equal to the outgoing masses, so to say elastic scattering. I didn't see a further restriction in Srednicki's formula apart from being in the CMS.

If I take e.g. Compton scattering I get with Srednicki's formula: $$\left(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right)_{CM}=\frac{\left|\mathcal{M}\right|^2}{64\pi^2E_{CM}^2} $$ but Peskin gets on page 164 with his formula for the differential cross section: $$\left(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right)_{CM}=\frac{1}{32} \frac{1}{E_1E_2}\frac{\left|\textbf{k}^\prime\right|}{E_{CM}}$$ where $E_1+E_2=E_{CM}$.

I don't see, that this is equal? Is it actually equal? Where did I miss something?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Can you check the page number for Srednicki? I'm looking at a digital library copy that I can't flip through easily, and page 97 is in the section "Loop corrections to the propagator". EDIT: Nevermind, found it on pages 79-84. $\endgroup$
    – jwimberley
    Commented Oct 1, 2013 at 16:44

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The formula given by Srednicki $$d \sigma_{\textrm{CM}} = \frac{1}{64 \pi^2 s } \frac{|\bf{p}'|}{|\bf{p}|}|\mathcal{M}|^2 d \Omega_{\textrm{CM}}$$ is the general result for the CM $2 \to 2$ scattering where we have

$\bf{p}_1 = - \bf{p}_2 = \bf{p}$, $\bf{p}_3 = - \bf{p}_4 = \bf{p}'$, $(E_1 + E_2) = (E_3 + E_4) =\sqrt{s} $ and

$$ |{\bf{p}}| = \tfrac{1}{2\sqrt{s}}\sqrt{\lambda(s,m_1^2,m_2^2)}, \quad \quad |{\bf{p}'}| = \tfrac{1}{2\sqrt{s}}\sqrt{\lambda(s^2,m_3^2,m_4^2)} $$ with $\lambda(x,y,z) = (x-y-z)^2 - 4y z$ being the Källen function. Furthermore, we have $$E_{1/2} = \frac{s \pm (m_1^2 - m_2^2)}{2\sqrt{s}} \quad \quad E_{3/4} = \frac{s \pm (m_3^2 - m_4^2)}{2\sqrt{s}} $$

As you have correctly observed, for $m_1=m_3$ and $m_2=m_4$ we indeed obtain $\frac{|\bf{p}'|}{|\bf{p}|} =1 $ and the formula reduces to

$$d \sigma_{\textrm{CM}} = \frac{1}{64 \pi^2 s } |\mathcal{M}|^2 d \Omega_{\textrm{CM}} $$

On page 164 Peskin is referring to Eq. 4.84 which reads $$ \frac{d \sigma_{\textrm{CM}} }{d \Omega_{\textrm{CM}}} = \frac{1}{2 E_1 2 E_2 v_{12}} \frac{|\bf{p}'|}{(2\pi)^2 4 \sqrt{s}}, $$ with $v_{12}$ being the absolute value of the relative velocity of incoming particles. This expression is actually the same as the Sredinicki formula, just written in a slightly different way. To see this, observe that in any frame $v_{12}$ can be rewritten as $$ v_{12} =|{\bf{v}}_1 - {\bf{v}}_2| = \left | \frac{{\bf{p}_1}}{E_1} - \frac{{\bf{p}_2}}{E_2} \right | = \frac{\sqrt{(E_1 {\bf{p}_2} - E_2 {\bf{p}_1})^2}}{E_1 E_2} $$ and when we go to the CM frame ${\bf{p}} \equiv \bf{p_1} = - \bf{p}_2$ we end up with $$ v_{12} = \frac{|{\bf{p}}|(E_1 + E_2)}{E_1 E_2} = \frac{|{\bf{p}}|\sqrt{s}}{E_1 E_2} $$ Plugging this into Peskin's formula you arrive to $$ \frac{d \sigma_{\textrm{CM}} }{d \Omega_{\textrm{CM}}} = \frac{1}{64 \pi^2 s} \frac{|\bf{p}'|}{|\bf{p}|} |\mathcal{M}|^2 $$ in perfect agreement with Srednicki.

So yes, it is actually equal.

By the way, notice that in any frame where the particle velocities are parallel or antiparallel, $v_{12}$ can be written in a covariant form since $$ (p_1 \cdot p_2)^2 - m_1^2 m_2^2 = E_1^2 E_2^2 {(1 - \bf{v}_1 \cdot \bf{v}_2)^2} - E_1^2 E_2^2 {(1- {\bf{v}}_1^2) (1- {\bf{v}}_2^2)} = E_1^2 E_2^2 ({\bf{v}_1} - {\bf{v}}_2)^2 $$ where we used $({\bf{v}_1} \cdot {\bf{v}_2})^2 = {\bf{v}_1^2} {\bf{v}_2^2}$, so that $$ v_{12} = \frac{\sqrt{ (p_1 \cdot p_2)^2 - m_1^2 m_2^2}}{E_1 E_2} $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hi vsht, I believe that in the expression for $(p_1\cdot p_2)^2$ we should have $|E_1\mathbf{p}_2-E_2\mathbf{p}_1|^2$ so that the cross term is $-2E_1 E_2\mathbf{p}_1\cdot\mathbf{p}_2$ when expanded out, not $-2E_1 E_2|\mathbf{p}_1||\mathbf{p}_2|$? Also, could you help me with how you derived the expression $v_{12}=\frac{\sqrt{(p_1\cdot p_2)^2-m_1^2 m_2^2}}{E_1 E_2}$? In which frame are $E_1$ and $E_2$ defined? Thank you very much!! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2017 at 14:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Many thanks for your comment. I agree with your correction, but in fact this whole formula is not needed, since one can use a much simpler one. Also I was too sloppy regarding $v_{12}$. We can write it in a covariant form, but only in the frames where the particle velocities are parallel or antiparallel. I updated my answer accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – vsht
    Commented Nov 8, 2017 at 7:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.