0
$\begingroup$

I'm studying about Image method with "Introduction to electrodynamics-Grffiths"

And, this book explains the process finding the induced surface charge density when a point charge $q$ is held a distance $d$ above an infinite grounded conducting plane.

I was able to understand the process of finding the electric potential $V$. But my confusion begins now.

Now that we know the potential, it is a straightforward matter to compute the surface charge $\sigma$ induced on the conductor. According to $\sigma=-\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial V}{\partial n}$....

I can't understand how $\sigma=-\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial V}{\partial n}$ can be used in this situation. As i know, it is formula when $V$ is electric potential 'immediately outside of conductor', not 'grounded conducting plane'.

Also, it is written like this in the book:

Because the field inside a conductor is zero, boundary condition requires that the field immediately outside is: $\vec{E}=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \hat{n}$. In terms of potential, this yields $\sigma=-\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial V}{\partial n}$

In summary, I don't know why the formulas that apply for conductors can't be applied to a 'grounded infinite conductor plate'.

Or can a 'grounded infinite conductive plate' be considered $\vec{E}=0$ for the region without charge, like a conductor ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

If you're only interested in what's happening on one side of the plate, you may ignore the other side (assuming infinite conductivity). Infinite conductivity forces $\vec{E}=0$ inside the plate, so there cannot be charge there: charge can only be on the surface. It thus doesn't matter how thick the plate is or what's happening on the far side.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.