2
$\begingroup$

How can i show that $\delta\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\rho}$ transforms like a tensor?

Metric compatibility is not assumed here.

That means

1) First i need to compute $\delta\Gamma$ first. To do that i need an explicit formula for it. But without metric compatibility, I don't which should i use. Like i get one from principle of equivalence :

$$ \Gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\lambda}=\frac{\partial^2\zeta^\alpha}{\partial x^\mu \partial x^\nu}\frac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial\zeta^\alpha} $$

Where $\zeta$'s are local inertial coordinates obeying

$$ d\tau^2 = -\eta_{\alpha\beta}\zeta^\alpha\zeta^\beta $$

I'm confused about how to compute $\delta\Gamma$ from this.

2) After computing $\delta\Gamma$ I have to show it transforms like a (1,2) type tensor. Which i think i can manage if i can manage the 1.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Here we will use the physicist's definition of a tensor in terms of local coordinate transformations. Needless to say that this can also be cast in a mathematically manifestly covariant language.

It is well-known that the Christoffel symbol$^1$ $\Gamma^{\lambda}_{\mu\nu}$ does not transform as a tensor under a local coordinate transformation $x^{\mu} \to y^{\rho}=y^{\rho}(x)$, but rather with an inhomogeneous term, which is built from the second derivative of the coordinate transformation,

$$\tag{1}\frac{\partial y^{\tau}}{\partial x^{\lambda}} \Gamma^{(x)\lambda}_{\mu\nu} ~=~\frac{\partial y^{\rho}}{\partial x^{\mu}}\, \frac{\partial y^{\sigma}}{\partial x^{\nu}}\, \Gamma^{(y)\tau}_{\rho\sigma}+ \frac{\partial^2 y^{\tau}}{\partial x^{\mu} \partial x^{\nu}}. $$

Thus if we consider the (not necessarily infinitesimal) difference

$$\tag{2} \Delta \Gamma^{\lambda}_{\mu\nu}~:=~\Gamma^{(1)\lambda}_{\mu\nu}-\Gamma^{(2)\lambda}_{\mu\nu} $$

between two sets of Christoffel symbols, corresponding to two tangent-space connections $\nabla^{(1)}$ and $\nabla^{(2)}$, the difference will evidently transform as a (1,2) tensor

$$\tag{3}\frac{\partial y^{\tau}}{\partial x^{\lambda}} \Delta\Gamma^{(x)\lambda}_{\mu\nu} ~=~\frac{\partial y^{\rho}}{\partial x^{\mu}}\, \frac{\partial y^{\sigma}}{\partial x^{\nu}}\, \Delta\Gamma^{(y)\tau}_{\rho\sigma}, $$

as the inhomogeneous terms cancel.

--

$^1$ It is covenient to call $\Gamma^{\lambda}_{\mu\nu}$ Christoffel symbols even if the tangent-space connection $\nabla$ is not torsionfree nor compatible with a metric.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Correction: The word covenient should read convenient. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 25, 2013 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.