I have found no way to rigorously establish the basic one-dimensional kinematic equation relating the two following expressions of average velocity without using some kind of argument that amounts to taking limits as is done in calculus
$$\bar{v}=\frac{\Delta{x}}{\Delta{t}}=\frac{v_i+v_f}2 .$$
I can provide the following heuristic argument.
By definition constant velocity means $\Delta x=v\Delta t$. We can illustrate that as either a point-slope graph, or as the area under the line representing constant velocity.
From that we can illustrate $\bar{v}\Delta{t}=\Delta{x}$ in the same way, by saying average velocity multiplied by the time interval gives the displacement $\Delta x$ as if it were a constant velocity.
The actual position and velocity graphs for constant acceleration are more complicated. At this point in the development I can't even justify the graph of position with respect to time. But I can hand-wave it. Even without the $x:t$ graph it is intuitively clear that the position at $t=t_o+\Delta t/2$ isn't $x_o+\Delta x/2.$ That's because the body moves further in the second half than in the first half of the period.
By definition the average of the two numbers $v_o$ and $v_f$ is half their sum. If, based on the case of constant velocity, we assume the area under the velocity graph is the displacement, then simple geometry and algebra give
$$\begin{align} \Delta x&=x_f-x_o\\ &=\left(v_o+\frac{v_f-v_o}{2}\right)\Delta t\\ &=\frac{v_o+v_f}{2}\Delta t\\ &=\bar{v}\Delta t\\ &=\left(v_o+\frac{a\Delta t}{2}\right)\Delta t,\\ x_f&=x_o+v_o\Delta t+\frac{1}{2}a\Delta t^2. \end{align}$$
Without using the methods of calculus, I see no way to obtain these results without either assuming
$$\bar{v}=\frac{v_o+v_f}{2}=\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t},$$
or assuming the area under the velocity graph equals the displacement. Is it possible to rigorously show the two forms $\bar{v}=\Delta{x}/\Delta{t}$ and $\bar{v}=\left(v_i+v_f\right)/2$ of average velocity are equal without using calculus?