6
$\begingroup$

I'm sure the answer is yes, but how is this shown? Normally for a single spin-1/2 you have a time reversal operator: $-i \sigma_y \hat{K}$ where $\sigma_y$ is the second Pauli matrix and $\hat{K}$ is the conjugation operator. How is this generalized to two spins?

I am thinking of whether or not interactions like exchange ($J \hat{S}_1 \cdot \hat{S}_2$) or the hyperfine interaction (contact Fermi: $a \hat{S} \cdot \hat{I}$) break time reversal symmetry.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question. General time reversal is $T=UK$ where $K$ is complex conjugation and $U$ is some unitary matrix. Wiki gives a representation for a particle with definite spin (not necessarily 1/2). So I would recommend: go to the $|jm\rangle$ basis (rather than $|m_1 m_2\rangle$) and try a block diagonal $U$ based on wiki's. You'll have to check it satisfies all the properties of a good time reversal, but it should. $\endgroup$ – Michael Brown Sep 24 '13 at 5:03
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If the spin $S_i$ is odd under time reversal symmetry, $S_1.S_2$ should be even under time reversal symmetry. $\endgroup$ – Trimok Sep 24 '13 at 9:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Timrok, I see your point. In this paper, the opposite is assumed: arxiv.org/abs/1304.5096 $\endgroup$ – BeauGeste Sep 24 '13 at 18:46
  • $\begingroup$ From a quick look at the Lunde paper, I think what they're saying is that if you have a spin-spin interaction, then the mean field experienced by single particles violates time-reversal symmetry. The mean field always violates lots of symmetries that are present in the underlying two-body interaction. For example, in a nucleus, we have a mean field that is an attractive potential with a certain shape, centered on a certain point in space. This clearly violates translational invariance, even though the two-body interaction is symmetric under translational invariance. $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Oct 6 '13 at 14:43
3
$\begingroup$

I think the answer should be 'no'.

Because when we introduce the antiunitary time-reversal(TR) opeartor $T$ for spin-system, it should satisfy $T\mathbf{S}_iT^{-1}=-\mathbf{S}_i$ since angular-momentum should be sign reversed under TR(due to the classical correspondence). Thus, spin-spin interactions like $\mathbf{S}_i\cdot\mathbf{S}_j$ are invariant under TR.

The TR operator $T$ for the $N$-spin-$1/2$ system has a form $T=(-i)^N\sigma_1^y\sigma_2^y...\sigma_N^yK$, where $K$ is the conjugation operator. You can easily check that $T$ is antiunitary and satisfy $T\mathbf{S}_iT^{-1}=-\mathbf{S}_i$. Furthermore, $T^2=(-1)^N$, so for odd-number spin system(including single spin case), if the Hamiltonian has TR symmetry, we will arrive at the well-known Kramers theorem.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.