Problem: Given the wave function $\Psi_0=A\sin^2(\theta)$ along with the Hamiltonian operator of a physical system: $H=\frac{L^2}{2I}+g B L_z$,

  1. find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of $\hat{H}$ and
  2. derive the form of $\Psi(t)$.

Solution: I apply the $\hat{U}(t)$ time-evolution operator on $\Psi_0$ to get $\Psi(t)$: $\Psi(t)=\hat{U}(t)\Psi_0=\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar} H t\right) \Psi_0$.

In order to calculate the effect of $\hat{H}$ on $\Psi_0$, I need to write $\Psi_0$ as a linear combination of the spherical harmonics $Y_{\ell m}$. I have a list of the first few (up to $\ell=2$) spherical harmonics in my textbook, but I am not so sure on how to proceed. The best guess I can think of is: $Y_{20}=\sqrt{\frac{5}{16\pi}}(3\cos^2(\theta)-1)$ if I consider that $\cos^2(\theta)=1-\sin^2(\theta)$.

Then $\Psi_0 = \frac{2}{3}A - \left(\frac{A}{3}\sqrt{\frac{16\pi}{5}} \right)Y_{20}$.

My questions are these (edited more than once):

  1. How do I tackle the constant term ? Do I use $Y_{00}=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi}}$ for that?
  2. Is it physically meaningful to have $Y_{\ell m}$ terms with different $\ell$ in the same wave function, like e.g. $Y_{00} + Y_{20}$ ? I am asking because until now I was encountering only terms with the same $\ell$ but different $m$. I presume it is.
  3. Is there anything fundamentally wrong with my strategy?
  4. How do I calculate constant A? I used the normalization condition $|\Psi_0|^2=1$, and since $\hat{U}(t)$ is unitary, $\Psi(t)$ will also be normalized.

    Finally, $\Psi_0 = \sqrt{\frac{5}{6}}Y_{00}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{6}}Y_{20}$. At this point I have the following question:

  5. How do I calculate $\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht\right)$ say on $Y_{20}$? I recollect a theorem which states that if operator $\hat{A}$ has eigenvalues $\alpha$, then operator $f(\hat{A})$ has the same eigenfunctions with eigenvalues $f(\alpha)$ ($f$ needs to fullfil some criteria that escape me). Anyway, the "problem" is that in this case $\hat{H}$ is a function of both $L^2$ and $L_z$.

Given that $Y_{\ell m}$ constitute a common set of eigenfunctions for both $L^2$ and $L_z$, could I claim that $Y_{20}$ is also an eigenfunction of $H(L,L_z)$ with eigenvalues $\frac{\hbar^2 \ell (\ell+1)}{2I} + gB(m\hbar), m \in Z$ ?

EDIT: I use this Mathematica snippet to verify my results (up until now):

$\text{In:=} \text{FullSimplify}\left[\frac{4}{3} \sqrt{\pi } A Y_{00}-\frac{A}{3} \sqrt{\frac{16 \pi }{5}} Y_{20}\text{ /.}\,\\ \left\{Y_{20}\to \sqrt{\frac{5}{16 \pi }} \left(3 \text{Cos}^2(t)-1\right),Y_{00}\to \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi }}\right\}\right]\\ \text{Out=}A-A \text{Cos}^2[t]$

  • $\begingroup$ I haven't checked your numbers (and you have some minor typos), but your approach seems reasonable. $\endgroup$
    – Siva
    Sep 23, 2013 at 2:53
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, SO is renumbering my 5th question. Can I force number 5 over 1 ? $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Sep 23, 2013 at 5:10
  • $\begingroup$ does that help? Markdown doesn't use the numbers you give it... it uses those numbers to switch on its numbering environment and number them as it sees fit. For all it cares, you could have any 5 numbers there on your list :-) To have consequtive numbering, you should avoid breaking the list with your one-line comment in between, which I did by adding a couple of spaces before that line. $\endgroup$
    – Siva
    Sep 23, 2013 at 17:13

2 Answers 2

  1. Yep.
  2. Yep, perfectly fine.
  3. This will work. The general method is that the expansion coefficients are given by the inner product $\int \psi^\star_{lm} \Psi_0$ where $\psi_{lm}$ are the orthonormal basis functions of your expansion and the integral is over the full space with the natural measure. In your case the basis functions are the spherical harmonics and the measure is $\mathrm{d}\Omega \equiv \sin\theta \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\phi$. You can plug in a general spherical harmonic and by doing the integrals get the answer, though in your simple case your method is easier and equivalent. By the way, Mathematica knows about spherical harmonics already (SphericalHarmonicY, but make sure it uses the same conventions as you).

The general method is like finding the Fourier series by doing a bunch of integrals. The method you are using is like reading off the Fourier series coefficients by rearranging the function itself to look like a Fourier series. When you can do it you get the same answer as by doing the integrals, but it's not always easy to do the rearrangement.

RE edits to the question.

Q4. Yep, again. :)

Q5. It's as simple as noting that $L^2 Y_{lm} = l(l+1) Y_{lm}$ and $L_z Y_{lm}= m Y_{lm}$ (I'm dropping factors $\hbar$ which you can put back yourself if need be). Just plug your $\Psi_0$ in $H\Psi_0$ and use the fact that all the operators are linear. It's easy to do term by term and you'll see that you get just the answer you've expected. That's because all of these operators $H,L^2,L_z$ are simultaneously diagonalizable (because they commute) and we're working in the basis of their common eigenfunctions.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Michael! (I don't have enough karma to upvote your answer.) $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Sep 23, 2013 at 5:16
  • $\begingroup$ I just upvoted you :) $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Jun 15, 2014 at 20:07

Let $$P_{l}^{m}=|Y_{l}^{m}><Y_{l}^{m}|.$$


$$H=\sum_{l,m}\{\frac{l(l+1)}{2I}+gBm\}P_{l}^{m},\;\hat{U}(t)=\sum_{l,m}% \exp[-\frac{it}{\hslash}\{\frac{l(l+1)}{2I}+gBm\}]P_{l}^{m},$$


$$\Psi(t)=\sum_{l,m}\exp[-\frac{it}{\hslash}\{\frac{l(l+1)}{2I}+gBm\}]P_{l}% ^{m}\Psi_{0} \\=\sum_{l,m}\exp[-\frac{it}{\hslash}\{\frac{l(l+1)}{2I}% +gBm\}]<Y_{l}^{m}|\Psi_{0}>|Y_{l}^{m}>$$

Your remark: " I recollect a theorem which states that if operator $\hat{A}$ has eigenvalues $\alpha$, then operator $f(\hat{A})$ has the same eigenfunctions with eigenvalues $f(\alpha)$ " is completely correct and for general $\Psi_{0}$ you only need to calculate the overlap (inner product) $<Y_{l}^{m}|\Psi_{0}>.$

$\Psi_{0}$ which are combinations of terms with different $l$'s and $m$'s, say


result in

$$\Psi(t)=\sum_{l_{1},m_{1}}c_{l_{1}m_{1}}\exp[-\frac{it}{\hslash}\{\frac {l_{1}(l_{1}+1)}{2I}+gBm_{1}\}]Y_{l_{1}}^{m_{1}}$$

since $<Y_{l}^{m}|Y_{l_{1}}^{m_{1}}>=\delta_{ll_{1}}\delta_{mm_{1}}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.