5
$\begingroup$

Say I have a detached bicycle wheel and I roll it down an infinite, flat, asphalt inclined plane, in air (ie there will be a terminal velocity). When, if ever, will the wheel fall over?

I've been wanting to try this and see, but I don't know of a suitable hill near my house. My second question is if someone can recommend such a hill in the Trenton, NJ, USA area.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Make sure the wheel is really heavy and there is something fragile strategically placed on the bottom :-) $\endgroup$ – ja72 Sep 22 '13 at 2:13
1
$\begingroup$

First off, great question.

Ok I have crunched the numbers. I made a 5 degree of freedom model of the rolling disk/wheel which includes, 2 variables $x$, $y$ for the location on the incline plane (with positive $x$ downwards and $y$ across the plane), $\psi$ for the orientation of the wheel ($\psi=0$ when wheel is facing downwards), $\phi$ for the tilt of the wheel from the incline, and finally $\theta$ the spin of the wheel (with $\dot{\theta}=\omega$).

Included is the incline plane angle $\gamma$ and gravity $g$, and the rolling radius of the wheel $r$. The no-slip condition is described as $\omega r = \dot{x} \cos \psi + \dot{y} \sin \psi $ (the velocity along the $\psi$ direction).

The equations simplify when I use $\dot{x} = \omega r \cos\psi + v_{slip} \sin \psi$ and $\dot{y} = \omega r \sin \psi - v_{slip} \cos \psi $, to get the motion of the orientation and tilt as

$$ \begin{aligned} \ddot{\psi} & = \frac{2 \dot{\phi} ( \dot{\psi} \sin \phi - \omega)}{\cos \phi} + \frac{\sin\phi}{\cos^2 \phi} \left( \frac{2 \dot{\psi} v_{slip}}{r} - \frac{2 g \cos \psi \sin \gamma}{r} \right) \\ \ddot{\phi} & = \frac{ \cos\phi \left( \left( \frac{1}{2} I_{disk} \dot{\psi}^2 - m r^2 \dot{\phi}^2 \right) \sin\phi + I_{disk} \omega \dot{\phi} \right)}{\frac{1}{2} I_{disk} + m r^2 \sin^2 \phi} + \frac{g\, m\, r \sin\phi \cos \gamma}{\frac{1}{2} I_{disk} + m r^2 \sin^2 \phi} \end{aligned} $$

where $I_{disk}$ is the mass moment of inertia about the spin axis, and $\frac{1}{2} I_{disk}$ the mass moment of inertia about any other axis of the wheel.

So is the above stable? There are two scenarios that I can come up with.

  1. Stable when $\dot{\psi}=0$ and $\dot{\phi}=0$. This can only be true if $\psi=0$ or the orientation is always "downhill", but with a small disturbance it will throw it off. So not stable on this condition.
  2. Stable when $\dot{\psi}$ and $\dot{\phi}$ oscillate about zero with appropriate corrective twists $\ddot{\psi}$ and $\ddot{\phi}$ developing. I can only examine this case when $\phi \approx 0$ and $\phi \approx 0$. This has the solution of $$ \dot{\psi} =B \sin(2 \omega t) -A \cos(2 \omega t) \\ \dot{\phi} = B \cos(2 \omega t)+A \sin(2 \omega t) $$

Any coefficients of $A$, $B$ work when $\phi = 0$ and $\phi = 0$, but beyond that no constants would work. Nevertheless it shows that under some conditions the orientation and tilt couple in an stable oscillation, also known as a wobble to anyone who was rolled a coin on a table.

I think this is a far as anyone can take it without employing numerical methods, and I think this would make for a great thesis for someone.

PS. I used a MATLAB script with the symbolic toolbox to find this solution, with some custom code I have developed for 3d kinematics and the equations of motion for rigid bodies.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Cute question! This is not really an answer, but it's too long for a comment.

I have a metal ring that I keep my keys on, and I did some experiments rolling it down a book at various angles. I also tried a quarter.

Empirically, the result seems to depend on the angle $\theta$ at which the book is inclined, and there seem to be three regimes. For $\theta<\theta_{c1}$, the wheel falls over. For $\theta_{c1}<\theta<\theta_{c2}$, the wheel rolls without slipping. For $\theta>\theta_{c2}$, it seems to slip immediately and fall over, although it's a little hard to tell because the motion is so fast.

I would conjecture that the critical angles $\theta_{c1}$ and $\theta_{c2}$ are determined by expressions something like $\tan^{-1}(k\mu_s)$, where $k$ is a unitless constant that is different for $\theta_{c1}$ and $\theta_{c2}$ and that also depends on whether the wheel is a ring, solid disk, or whatever.

Looking forward to seeing a more definitive answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Using a smaller wheel is a really good idea. It reduces the need for a long hill. I'm particularly interested in the middle regime, whether it is actually stable. I have a 2.1 m table that I inclined at 3°; with a little starting push the quarter will reach the end without falling. Unfortunately I don't think it reaches terminal velocity and it is going too fast for me to tell if it is "going to fall" eventually. $\endgroup$ – Owen Sep 22 '13 at 2:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Owen: I think the general condition for stability is something of the form $v>v_s=\sqrt{cgr}$, where, e.g., $c=1/4$ for a ring or hoop (see physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2303868&postcount=6 ). So once the wheel reaches this speed, it should be stable forever. I would think that there's some characteristic time it takes for a stationary wheel to tip over (which would be something like $\sqrt{r/g}$), so the question would be whether it reaches $v_s$ in less than this time. $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Sep 22 '13 at 3:52
  • $\begingroup$ I'm wondering if the explanation on that page is the full story. When I roll the quarter down the table, it often starts veering off to either the left or right, and doesn't show signs of getting back on course -- if it veers off too far it might "wipe out" and fall down. My table isn't long enough to tell. $\endgroup$ – Owen Sep 22 '13 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.