I am imagining an unusual experiment which will require intense beams of either protons or neutrons. The experiment would work better with neutrons, but neutron sources are much weaker messier so I am considering both. I am interested in beams of almost any non-relativistic energy. I am not sure yet about how focused I will need the beam to be.

I know this is a beginner question, but what are the basic options here for the strongest source (as measured by neucleons per second)?

Neutron apparently come from two sources: reactors and accelerators. (As Sir Patrick Stewert can attest.) In the latter case ("spallation"), a proton beam is just slammed into a heavy-metal target and the neutrons that fly out are caught. It appears that the highest intensity protons beams are often used to produce the highest intensity neutron beams in this manner.

Saclay High Intensity Proton Injector Project (IPHI): $6 \times 10^{17}$ protons/second.

Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator (LEDA): $6 \times 10^{17}$ protons/second.

(These agree with Andre's chart below showing 100 mA. Note also that the LHC current is about 500 mA, although the protons are grouped into bunches. And as Andre pointed out, the LHC circulates the same protons and so could not provide a continuous 500 mA beam into a target/experiment that consumed them.)

Neutron sources, being the result of either fission or spallation, are messy. I still don't have a good handle on what kind of neutron intensities are possible for what momentum ranges. The Lujan Neutron Scattering Center at LANCE is a neutron source for many experiments.

In spallation, the number of neutrons produced per incident proton is usually on the order of 40, but the phase space distribution is much wider than the incident protons. (Protons beams can be directly focused using magnets.) According to a CERN report by Lengeler, reactors typically can produce thermal neutrons (~0.025 eV) fluxes of order $10^{14}$ neutrons/cm${}^2$s, whereas spallation sources can exceed $10^{17}$/cm${}^2$s.

It is probably best, then, to think of continuous neutron sources as phase-space-density limited, with the above numbers giving a rough estimate of the currently achievable densities.

Apparently, spallation sources are limited by the need to dissipate the heat from the incident proton beam. If high fluxes are needed only briefly, laser pulses can produce $4 \times 10^{9}$/cm${}^2$ over a nanosecond, i.e. an instantaneous flux of $4 \times 10^{18}$/cm${}^2$s.

As for protons, it's worth noting that the high-intensity 50 mA beam at the European Spallation Source is limited by "space charge effects at low energy, by the power that can be delivered to the beam in each cavity at medium and high energies, and by beam losses."

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The descriptive words (well, phrases) you want to use to search are "high current" or "high intensity" paired with "proton beam" or "neutron beam". That does not make a full description of the beam, however as energy and pulse structure may (probably) matter to you. In you need particle-physics energies (i.e. more than a few GeV), I think you go to CERN, FNAL or Brookhaven right now (many older accelerator facilities have been shut down in the last couple of decades). The Tevatron is gone at Fermi, but the Main Injector is still there and will be the basis for the Project X current upgrade. $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2013 at 14:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It occurs to me that there must also be a decent proton machine at KEK. Wikipedia says J-PARC get up to 50 GeV, and I know the T2K beam is reasonably intense so they run some pretty good current. $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2013 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks dmckee, I definitely hadn't heard the term "high current" before. Like I said, I'm interested in non-relativistic energies, so a GeV is overkill. $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2013 at 15:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A note on the 500mA of beam current of the LHC: these protons make 11'000 revolutions per second. If your experiment would absorb or otherwise destroy the beam, you could only use 1/11'000 of the 500 mA (I found that the highest beam intensities in 2012 were about $229\cdot10^{12}$ protons per beam). On the other hand, whether the beam is bunched or continuous does not affect the (time averaged) current. $\endgroup$ Oct 8, 2013 at 13:13

1 Answer 1


arxiv:1305.6917 has a nice graph comparing different proton accelerators with respect to beam intensity (in milliampere, $6.241\cdot10^{15}$ protons per second) vs. beam energy (I assume you mean man-made particle sources...):

proton beams comparison

The 590 MeV (kinetic energy), 2.2 mA proton beam at PSI is operational, I'm not sure about the higher intensity (but lower energy) LEDA and IPHI beams. Also, the graph does not contain the proposed proton source for DAEδALUS.

Some of these proton beams are also used (e.g. the PSI beam) to produce neutrons (for example using a spallation target). Since neutrons are neutral, there aren't any neutron accelerators.

  • $\begingroup$ This is extremely helpful. Thank you! What's an example of a natural proton/neutron beam? I'm looking for just about any source, so long as I can rotate it. $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2013 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ The sun for example must emit a very high number of protons per second (and I bet there are other sources in the universe), but admittedly these are not very focused... $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2013 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ what about this homemade proposal ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/aw-works/fsII/alt/altineller.pdf . $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Oct 9, 2013 at 14:56
  • $\begingroup$ interesting project ! But the current seems to be 0.019 mA (so in the lower region of the above diagram) and probably up to 106 keV (i.e. 0.000106 GeV) $\endgroup$ Oct 9, 2013 at 19:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.