0
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\Ket}[1]{\left|#1\right>}$ I began to study QFT using David Tong's notes. This is what the notes says (http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft.html page 21).

I work in the Schrödinger picture so my operators $\phi(\boldsymbol{x})$ and $\pi(\boldsymbol{x})$ do not have a time dependence. All time dependence in the Schrödinger picture is encapsulated in the states $\Ket{\psi}$ which evolve according to the Schrödinger equation \begin{equation} i\hbar \frac{d}{dt} \Ket{\psi} = H \Ket{\psi}. \end{equation}

The notation $\Ket{\psi} $ is deceiving since the wave function in quantum field theory is a functional of every possible configuration of the field $\phi$.

What does it mean that the time dependence of the operators are encapsulated by the functional $\Ket{\psi}$? If I solve the Schrödinger equation I can find $\Ket{\psi(t)}$, but then how do I relate this to my fields?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The paragraph in the middle is a direct quote from the lecture notes, right? When you cite sources directly, please a) link to the sources whenever possible and b) mark the quotes as blockquotes by adding a > before the quote in the editor $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Sep 7 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ Not an exact quote, but thanks for the tip. $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Sep 7 at 15:34

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Tong is merely referring to the usual relation between the Schrödinger picture and the Heisenberg picture. In the Heisenberg picture you have operators $O(t)$ and states $\lvert \psi\rangle$, in the Schrödinger picture you have operators $O$ and states $\lvert \psi(t)\rangle$.

The $\lvert \psi(t)\rangle$ "encapsulates" the time-dependence of the operators in the sense that the same time-evolution operator $U(t)$ yields the time-dependent states via $\lvert \psi(t)\rangle = U(t)\lvert \psi(0)\rangle$ and the time-dependent operators via $O(t) = U(t)O(0)U(t)^\dagger$, so both $\lvert \psi(t)\rangle$ and $O(t)$ "encapsulate" the same information about time evolution.

That in this case the operator $O$ additionally depends on position and you write $\phi(\vec x,t)$ in the Heisenberg picture and $\phi(\vec x)$ in the Schrödinger picture changes nothing.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ so when I solve the KG equation I'm working in the Heisenberg picture, right? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Sep 7 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Alex I wouldn't exactly say we're "solving" the KG equation but yes we should usually think about that equation as the Heisenberg picture equation for the field operators $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Sep 7 at 16:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.