-1
$\begingroup$

This

$$[A, [B,C]] + [C, [A,B]] + [B, [C,A]] = 0$$

This proof is not wanted, since there is an attachment of some variables.

How can you prove the equation?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is $[\cdot,\cdot]$ supposed to be the Poisson bracket as it is in the proof you referenced or do you mean the quantum mechanical commutator? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 18, 2013 at 12:10
  • $\begingroup$ In general you can't. But if [,] is the commutator, why dont just just expand the Jacobi formula? $\endgroup$
    – jinawee
    Commented Sep 18, 2013 at 12:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd consider this a math question. $\endgroup$
    – Nikolaj-K
    Commented Sep 18, 2013 at 12:25
  • $\begingroup$ Comments to the question (v1): Echoing Jonas's comment, is this a question about Poisson brackets or operator commutators? The proof is very different depending on which. And what is 'generalized' about the Jacobi identity? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 18, 2013 at 15:58

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You can use the definition of the QM commutator $[X,Y]=XY-YX$, then expand all the commutators and simplify.

$\endgroup$
0

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.