Straight from Wikipedia:
In Newtonian physics, free fall is any motion of a body where gravity is the only force acting upon it. In the context of general relativity, where gravitation is reduced to a space-time curvature, a body in free fall has no force acting on it.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Free_fall
Now let's think in terms of a system that has no force acting on it. Then, the only thing that is accelerating is your action of pushing you of the floor of the elevator. Hence, you would require infinitesimal work assuming no friction. Which is way less than you would need to reach the elevator top if you would in a "still standing" elevator. Therefore, it would be "easier".
Another argument without using that free fall behaves as if no force is acting (again assuming no friction) is, that if you're accelerating exactly the same as the elevator you would require only a small change in velocity to eventually reach the top. You can think of it in this way:
Suppose you're falling with the elevator (same speed) and at some point in time you decide to jump you therefore create a velocity upwards for yourself. Ignoring that you would also accelerate the elevator downwards (which would also help you to reach the top), you would get something like this:
$$
v_{\text{Person}} = -gt + \delta v,\\
v_{\text{ElevatorTop}} = -gt
$$
With $v$ being the respective velocity, then your relative velocity to the elevator would be $r_\text{rel} = \delta v$. You would therefore reach the elevator top after some time. Again the velocity you would have to generate would be infinitesimal.
When the elevator is standing still, you essentially have (after jumping):
$$
v_{\text{Person}} = -gt + \delta v,\\
v_{\text{ElevatorTop}} = 0
$$
It would require you to generate a velocity that is big enough to counteract the acceleration to get $r_\text{rel} > 0$ for enough time to reach the elevator (depends on distance of floor to top), which requires more energy.
Hope that helps.
Cheers