50
$\begingroup$

Our solar system itself contains two candidate "Earths"

One is Jupiter's moon Europa and another is Saturn's moon Titan. Both of them have the problem of having at low temperature as Sun's heat cannot reach them.

Jupiter is made up mostly of Hydrogen so is our Sun. Can we ignite Jupiter so that it will produce enough heat to warm these two earth like planets/satellites? What can be consequences of any of such attempt?

$\endgroup$

10 Answers 10

34
$\begingroup$

Jupiter's mass is too small to produce nuclear fusion.

Jupiter would need to be about 75 times as massive to fuse hydrogen and become a star

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter

This wikipedia page explains the detailed requirements of nuclear fusion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion

$\endgroup$
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Can anybody explain me why this answer got so many upvotes (and in such a short time)? $\endgroup$ – Eduardo Guerras Valera Dec 19 '12 at 15:00
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ @EduardoGuerrasValera And by "a short time" you mean two years $\endgroup$ – Lightness Races in Orbit Jul 30 '14 at 8:51
  • $\begingroup$ This is incorrect, since Jupiter contains deuterium, which fuses at much lower temperatures than hydrogen. The appropriate mass limit is more like 13 times the current mass of Jupiter. $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Sep 16 '17 at 8:18
23
$\begingroup$

There is a minor change to yyahn's answer. The isotopes Deuterium, and Lithium7 which are present in small amounts -left over from the big bang, can fuse at lower mass than pure hydrogen burning. The estimate is at around 65 mass Jupiter Lithium fuses with hydrogen to form two helium nuclei. Brown dwarfs as light as 13 mass Jupiter can ignite Deuterium fusion. So we seem to have some weak forms of fusion (on low abundance fuels) that can happen for some range of brown dwarf masses. See wikipedia on brown dwarfs.

$\endgroup$
11
$\begingroup$

No, Jupiter is simply not massive enough to sustain nuclear fusion (and effectively become a star).

Off the top of my head, I remember the statistic that it needs to be roughly 10 times bigger in order to generate the necessary gravitational forces at the core to initiate fusion and become a star.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ this means it won't self-ignite, but if a thermonuclear device were set off, would it burn? This is a question of areal density I think ($\rho R$) $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Dec 23 '10 at 20:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jeremy - no, it wouldn't. Fusion produces enough heat that it causes a star to expand which typically causes fusion to turn off because the density gets too low. Jupiter wouldn't be able to stably fuse hydrogen - it would quickly go out. $\endgroup$ – spencer nelson Feb 21 '11 at 3:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Spencer, you are correct in the limit of hydrodynamic equilibrium. But if the burn wave propagation is faster than the dynamical time, it would ignite. This is what happens in type 1a supernovae. $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Apr 11 '11 at 15:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Jeremy: Also, if by "burn" you mean a chemical reaction like a flame, you would need free oxygen for that, and there is none. It's also worth noting that we've observed comet hits on Jupiter, which produced explosions similar to those produced by thermonuclear bombs (actually, releasing more energy on the order of many thousand times anything we mere mortals can produce). Consider that this happens on a regular basis, and has already happened thousands or millions of times. $\endgroup$ – Ernie May 17 '11 at 21:06
8
$\begingroup$

He meant for two types of ignitions. One is fusion and another is burning. Fusion is not possible because it don't have enough mass of hydrogen. The second is also not possible because the absence of oxygen.

The chemical equation for the combustion of hydrogen gas is $2H_2+O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2 O$

The atmosphere of Jupiter is mostly helium and hydrogen. We can burn Jupiter's hydrogen if we have enough oxygen. But Jupiter is very big so we need a LOT of oxygen to burn a significant amount Jupiter's hydrogen (relative to Jupiter's volume).

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Could you elaborate? $\endgroup$ – Manishearth Dec 19 '12 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ One upvote from me. I am interested in igniting the Jupiter. How much Oxygen do I need to ignite AND burn off all hydrogen on Jupiter? How to calculate the amount of Oxygen needed? Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Stack0verflow Feb 15 at 14:48
7
$\begingroup$

This idea seems to crop up now and then. I will have to confess the thought occurred to me as a kid in grade school. The AC Clarke “2010” featured Jupiter being imploded by black monoliths and turning into a star. Even if you get a fusion bomb into the core of Jupiter, which would be tough to do, the explosion would have no measurable effects on the surface. There simply is insufficient pressure to fuse nuclei together. You would need some sort of pressure producing system that is also stable. You might consider putting a small black hole (an Earth mass BH or so) in the core of Jupiter, which might create a zone of imploding material that has nuclear fusion. The rub with this idea is you also ultimately turn Jupiter into a 3-4 meter radius black hole. A collection of Hawking radiating black holes might be better, but their masses would have to be tuned so they don’t absorb or lose mass. This would mean turning Jupiter into a Hawking radiation source as a "star." That is not a stable system. So to play it safe you tune the Hawking BHs to radiate away and then replenish them later. Again, none of this is a small feat.

Of course the idea is to create a sort of mini-solar system with the various moons. So even if you could by some means turn Jupiter on as a star the results after a few thousand years would be to turn the Jovian and Saturnian moons into liquid bodies. These moons would not turn into Earth-like planets.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

A star is not burning in the typical sense of burning that we have on earth. It's fusing hydrogen into helium. And it does this because it has so much mass that gravity is trying to collapse the star but the immense pressure means fusion takes place (creating an outward pressure to counteract the gravity pulling inwards creating a balance which must be maintained to keep the sun from collapsing inwards or exploding. ) so a star is defined by it's mass. You have brown dwarfs that are almost massive enough to start fusion.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Another option would be to suspend fusion "lanterns" in Jupiter or Saturn's atmosphere and guide the output toward a target moon. You could also put a soletta, a series of lightweight mirrors acting as a lens, in between the moon and the sun. The multi-body orbital dynamics and the system of mirrors (or other "thrusters") to keep it from being "blown away" by the solar wind gets pretty complicated though.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Further to Lawrence B. Crowell's excellent answer above: in the past, Jupiter was often described (temptingly but mistakenly) as a failed star. It's not even close to the mass needed for self-ignited fusion, and dropping e.g. an Earth-mass mini black hole wouldn't light or sustain nuclear fusion. The mass would still be too low.

However, supposing you could corral a mini black hole and nudge it close enough for Jupiter to capture and swallow it, the black hole would generate huge amounts of energy by consuming anything and everything that dropped into it, but it would also generate a tremendous counterpressure that would prevent its swallowing Jupiter at a gulp.

After oscillating countless times and who-knows-how-many years, the black hole would settle in the center and eventually (inevitably) suck nearly all of Jupiter into itself, all the while producing gobs and gobs of energy that might or might not be useful to anyone. Because of the counterpressure, the process would take a very (I mean a very) long time, but it wouldn't be fusion. For that you'd need enough mass for at least a dwarf star, whether brown, white, or lavender.

[Edit/afterthought]: Only two candidate Earths? Have your forgotten dear old Mars? Incidentally, Jupiter's existing magnetic field pretty much rules out the possibility of ever establishing a human presence on Jupiter's biggest, most succulent moons. Alas for Robert A. Heinlein's 'Farmer in the Sky'...

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Just to say there is a closely related question here: Turning Jupiter into a star

There Ron Maimon refers back to early research in 1977 by Weaver and Wood - that it would be possible to create a one-off fusion explosion if Jupiter had a deuterium rich layer (abundance would need to be at least 1 : 300). But - this would also be set off by a giant comet or asteroid hitting Jupiter which would seem to suggest it's impossible as if there was such a layer it would have exploded long ago. Anyway it's just an explosion, not a star lasting for any length of time. But thought it should be mentioned for completeness. All of the answers here naturally are based on the idea of aiming for a steady state, like a star, but if a one off explosion is all that is needed, you don't need anything like as much deuterium.

$\endgroup$
-2
$\begingroup$

The most likely answer is that probably Jupiter is already ignited: it emits lots of infrared radiation that as far as i know, its largely unexplained. It just doesn't have enough mass to radiate more energy than a extremely dim brown dwarf, so it naively looks to us as a planet

$\endgroup$

protected by Qmechanic Sep 11 '14 at 18:32

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.