0
$\begingroup$

From the (Wikipedia's) definition of the astronomical unit $AU$, we have that it is defined as:

$AU=\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{GMD^2}{k^2}}$

Where $k\approx0.01720209895$ is Gauss' gravitational constant, $G$ is Newton's gravitational constant, $M$ is the mass of the Sun and $D$ is the time period of one day. Therefore, according to several observations, pointing to an increasing astronomical unit at a tremendous pace (around $15$ cm a year), this means that the Sun is gaining approximately $6\times10^8$ kg per year (taking into account Sun's mass year losses).

Questions: (1) first of all, why does the distance from the Sun increase with Sun's mass augment? Shouldn't the gravitational attraction be stronger and attract the Earth more rapidly, instead of getting it away? And (2) how is this increment in the $AU$ explained? $6\times10^8$ kg per year seems unphysical.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The mass of the sun decreases by converting mass to energy , it is not augmented, so the attractive force diminishes and the orbit grows, $\endgroup$
    – trula
    Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 22:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Then is the formula wrong? Why does it exist then? $\endgroup$
    – Antoniou
    Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 22:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is Earth getting closer to the sun, or farther away? $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 22:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Gauss’ gravitational “constant” is something I (with a physics Ph.D.) had never even heard of. It depends on the mass of the Sun, which may explain your confusion. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 22:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ That equation does not define the AU. It is currently defined as 149,597,870,700 meters, as the Wikipedia article explains. Thus the AU does not change as the Sun loses mass. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 22:55

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The source of the confusion is contained in Gauss's gravitational constant $k$. It's defined to be such that the equation you gave is true. So the definition is really giving nothing more than a conversion between $AU$ and $k$. You can't use this equation to calculate how far away earth will be when the mass of the sun changes or what the mass of the sun is given how far away the earth is; both $k$ and $AU$ would just be updated accordingly so that they both still have the relation given by your definition.

In actuality, $AU$ is now defined to be a specific distance that is not directly tied to the distance of the earth from the sun, even though of course it is approximately equal to it, and $k$ has been recommended to be discontinued in its use.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.