1
$\begingroup$

We know that a metric tensor raises or lowers the indices of a tensor, for e.g. a Levi-Civita tensor. If we are in $4D$ spacetime, then \begin{align} g_{mn}\epsilon^{npqr}=\epsilon_{m}{}^{pqr}\tag{1} \end{align} where $g_{mn}$ is the metric and $\epsilon^{npqr}$ is the Levi-Civita tensor.

The Levi-Civita symbol, which we can denote by $\varepsilon^{npqr}$, is not a tensor. It obeys the relation \begin{align} \varepsilon^{npqr}=\varepsilon_{npqr} \tag{2}. \end{align}

What happens if the metric tensor is multiplied with the Levi-Civita symbol $\varepsilon^{npqr}$? \begin{align} g_{mn}\varepsilon^{npqr}=\, \tag{3}? \end{align}

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

If i understand correctly the Levi-Civita symbol is the function $\varepsilon : \{0, \dots, 3\}^4 \to \{-1,0,1\}$ that that sends a permutation of $\{0,\dots,3\}$ to its sign and non-permutations to 0.

Since it is a function and not a tensor (and not even defined on the manifold) its "upper" or "lower" indices have no actual meaning and are only a tool used for convenience to use the summation convention. We define the Levi-Civita symbol with any combination of upper and lower indices to be the same function that sends the indices to $\varepsilon( \mathrm{indices})$.

Now $g_{mn}$ is not the metric tensor, rather it is a component function of the metric tensor that is to say it is a smooth function $g_{mn} : M \to \mathbb{R}$, where $M$ is our manifold. So that locally $g = g_{mn} dx^m \otimes dx^n$ where $x^0, \dots , x^3$ is some coordinate system and $g$ is the metric tensor.

Now the expression $g_{mn} \varepsilon^{npqr}$ is totally degenerate because it depends on the choosen basis. It is simply a function (that for fixed $m, p,q,r$) sends a point $s$ on $M$ to the number $g_{mn}(s) \varepsilon^{npqr}$.

The index lowering/increasing isomorphism acts on (non degenerate) tensor fields and not on functions and especially not on functions that are not defined on the manifold.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is meant by saying that the expression $g_{mn}\varepsilon^{npqr}$ is totally degenerate? $\endgroup$
    – vyali
    Commented Jun 22, 2023 at 10:22
0
$\begingroup$

Your equation $2$ is not correct. It is only true for flat spaces. For the purposes of this question, I shall work with Lorentzian manifolds. The object you call Levi-civita tensor is actually called a volume form and is not really a tensor but a tensor density. It tells you the volume density in your space-time. Furthermore, like the Levi-civita tensor in flat space it is completely ani-symmetric. It is usually defined as

$$ \epsilon_{12...n} = \sqrt{-g}$$

where $g = det(g_{\mu \nu})$. A straightforward calculation shows (remembering the Leibniz definition of determinant)

$$ \epsilon^{12...n} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{-g}}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you happen to know why it is defined so? Also, as written, the LHS is a tensor that takes many vectors (or 1-forms), but the RHS seems to be a scalar quantity after contraction. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2023 at 2:49
  • $\begingroup$ @emir sezik, I know the difference between the Levi-Civita tensor and Levi-Civita tensor density. $\epsilon^{npqr}$ in my original post is the Levi-Civita tensor and not the tensor density. $\endgroup$
    – vyali
    Commented Jun 21, 2023 at 4:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.