There was a post in Seasoned Advice which piqued my personal interest (seeing as how I'm ABC myself). Rice cooker pots are by no means "cheap", so I thought I'd look into it myself in order to see if I could arrive to a definitive answer.

My initial search led me to this paper:

Porosity and hardness of long-grain Brown rice kernels in relation to their chemical compositions (.pdf backup)

...as well as these "specifications" (Note: Dupont has a disclaimer disqualifying their table as a "specification", basically due to data error tolerances/variability/lack of precision or control uniformity, but for lack of a better word...):

Properties Of Teflon™ Coatings (.pdf backup)

Mechanical Properties of Teflon® Coatings (.pdf backup)

Unfortunately, as far as I was able to determine, it seems that the properties enumerated by the study and the tables are not directly comparable (from a purely arithmetic perspective?), as the former derived "64.6 to 213.7 N" (which, if I'm understanding correctly, was given as Newtons — a unit of measure for force — for its measure of tensile and breaking strength, whereas of the latter sources, one had no quantitative measures at all and cited qualitative descriptors in-lieu of, and the other reported an ambiguous range — with no additional clarification of parameters save the "Scratch Resistance scratch master" — as "5.1kg–13.2kg", which is a mass measure.

As I understand it, when we talk about a material's "hardness" and "scratch susceptibility", the specific context needs to established in order to disambiguate the lexical term "hardness", which can apparently refer to a variety of distinct (but possibly) correlated material properties and characteristics. For example, "Hardness correlates linearly to Ultimate Tensile Strength through the empirical (although theoretically [un]explained[sic]) equation H=UTS/k".

According to the Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology (2001)...

Scratch hardness is defined as the hardness of a material when it is scratched by a stylus dragged along its surface under a given load. Unlike pure indentation-based hardness tests, scratch hardness defines the resistance of material to plowing (i.e., a combination of indentation cum sliding) by a hard stylus...Many of the common tribological phenomena like sliding, abrasive, and cutting wear are characterized by a harder material plowing into the softer wearing material. Thus, for correlating the tribological performance of many materials, scratch hardness (Hs) is expected to be a better correlating parameter than the indentation hardness.

Unfortunately, I've gone about as far as my two-decade-old high school Physics B education is able to take me. It seems there are cases where we can strongly correlate such properties based on empirical, but I lack the requisite knowledge to apply such relationships to the specified context in any meaningful manner. Can someone kindly explain whether a definitive and quantitative or evidence-based answer can be derived from the given data? Or if not, exactly how indeterminate is it (i.e., can we extrapolate a probabilistic answer with some degree of confidence?). Thank you!


1 Answer 1


If it were possible to predict things like scratch resistance from some list of first principles then there would be no need of the field of materials science nor its practitioners (like I once was).

It is such a complex business that the best you can do is to develop standard testing & characterization methodology so that meaningful data on things like scratch resistance can be collected. In the best case you could hope for, you could then derive useful general (semi-empirical) correlations between things like ultimate strength, yield strength, rockwell hardness, charpy impact, etc. and scratch resistance.

  • $\begingroup$ You wouldn't happened to have worked with rice grains and Teflon coatings at any point during your career, would you? Haha. $\endgroup$
    – Arctiic
    Commented Jun 17, 2023 at 3:12
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, no! But I had a friend who worked in a rice mill's hull conveyor system and learned a lot about this from him. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 17, 2023 at 16:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.