I'm new to quantum mechanics, but not quite as new to linear algebra and operator theory, and trying to understand the nature of observations from a mathematical perspective.
Consider a two-dimensional Hilbert space with an orthonormal basis $|0\rangle$, $|1\rangle$. Define the Hermitian operator $P = |0\rangle\langle 0|$. $P\psi$ projects the state vector $\psi$ onto the line spanned by the ket $|0\rangle$. It has eigenvalue 1 corresponding to eigenstate $|0\rangle$, and eigenvalue 0 corresponding to eigenstate $|1\rangle$.
Suppose the state vector begins as $\psi = |1\rangle$. When we measure $\psi$ with the observable corresponding to $P$, by the Born rule we'll observe the eigenvalue 0 with probability 1.
But what eigenstate does $\psi$ take on after this measurement? It has to be projected onto $\text{span}\{|0\rangle\}$, but it's orthogonal to that subspace and such a projection produces the zero vector. That doesn't make any sense, because quantum states are rays (or equivalently unit vectors) in the Hilbert space.
There's an error in this logic somewhere, but I can't figure it out:
- Is my definition of an observable too broad? I understand that not all observables have physical meaning, but I don't see any sources specifically tell me that an observable can result in an unnormalizable state. Requiring observables' Hermitian operators to be full-rank would repair this but I've never seen this stated explicitly.
- Have I misconceived what an observable does to the quantum state upon measurement? I thought it projects $\psi$ onto the eigenbasis of the corresponding Hermitian operator.
- Is this setup just completely artificial with no physical consequences, requiring astronomical luck to have $\psi = e^{i\theta}|1\rangle$?