1
$\begingroup$

In Peskin and Schroeder exc. 4.3 we are asked to compute the differential cross section of $\Phi^1\Phi^2\rightarrow \Phi^1\Phi^2$ process for the linear sigma model: Compute, to leading order in $\lambda$, the differential cross section, in the center of mass frame, for the scattering process $\Phi^1\Phi^2 \rightarrow \Phi^1\Phi^2$.

Since all the particles involved have identical masses and we have two incoming and two outgoing particles, we can use (4.85): $$(d\sigma/d\Omega)_{CM} = \frac{|M|^2}{64\pi^2E_{CM}}.\tag{4.85}$$

Up to leading order in $\lambda$ we find $M=-2i\lambda$, since the Feynman rule for the vertex with particle types $i,j,k,l$ is $$-2i\lambda(\delta^{ij}\delta^{kl}+\delta^{il}\delta^{jk}+\delta^{ik}\delta^{jl}).$$ This would give a differential cross section of $$(d\sigma/d\Omega)_{CM} =\frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi^2E_{CM}}.$$ This is the answer that can be found in several sources (e.g. Zhong-Zhi Xianyu's solutions).

However, this only seems to take into account the interactions. As 4.85 is derived while ignoring the "trivial case" of forward scattering where no interaction takes place, I suspect a contribution due to forward scattering with no interaction is missing here. What is this contribution?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When you compute cross sections you trivially ignore the case of no interactions

You want to compute $\langle p_{1}p_{2}|S|k_{1}k_{2}\rangle$. If there are no interactions then $S = I$, the identity operator. For a theory with interactions we want to isolate the piece that is due to interactions, so we define $S = 1+iT$.

This is where the definition of the matrix element, $\mathcal{M}$ comes from:

$\langle p_{1}p_{2}|iT|k_{1}k_{2}\rangle = (2\pi)^{4}\delta^{(4)}(k_{1} + k_{2} - p_1 - p_2)\cdot i\mathcal{M}$.

Note we typically refer to forward scattering as in the the scattering angle of some incoming particle being $\theta \approx 0$, which is different than no scattering taking place at all.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.