2
$\begingroup$

For a Lie group $T(\theta)$ depending on a finite set of real parameters $\theta^a$,Weinberg (in his QFT book - Equations 2.2.17, 2.2.18, 2.2.19, p54) expands the unitary representations of $T$ in the neighbourhood of the identity as $$U(T(\theta)) = 1 + \theta^a t_a + \frac{1}{2}\theta^b\theta^c t_{bc}+ ... \tag{2.2.17}$$ and for the product of two representations $$U(T(\bar{\theta}) U(T(\theta)) = U(T(f(\bar{\theta},\theta)))\tag{2.2.18}$$ does the expansion $$f^a(\bar{\theta},\theta) = \theta^a + \bar{\theta}^a + f^a_{bc}\bar{\theta}^b\theta^c.\tag{2.2.19}$$

The main thing I don't understand is how the coefficients and indices are being determined in these expansions. The expansion of $U(T(0))$ is presumably a taylor series expansion around 0, but then I don't understand why only the parameter $\theta^a$ appears in the second term and then is replaced by $\theta^b\theta^c$ in the third term, or why $t_a$ changes to $t_{bc}$ and isn't squared in the third term. I have similar confusions about the change in parameters in the third term of the product expansion.

If someone could tell me precisely what formula Weinberg is using I would appreciate it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ $U(T(0)) = 1 + \theta t_a + \frac{1}{2}\theta^b\theta^c t_{bc}+ ... $ You left out the superscript $\alpha$ on the $ \theta$ in the second term. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 6:51
  • $\begingroup$ why only the parameter $\theta^a$ appears in the second term and then is replaced by $\theta^b\theta^c$ in the third term Do you understand that the names of dummy indices don’t matter? $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 6:52
  • $\begingroup$ So it's just completely arbitrary? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 7:23
  • $\begingroup$ I guess you should articulate 1. the expansion is in what variable? 2. the expansion is around what value? and then compare with the Taylor expansion of a multi-variable function. $\endgroup$
    – chichi
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 8:01

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

It's just the multivariable Taylor expansion. For functions of a single variable, $$f(x) = f(0) + x f'(0) + \frac{1}{2} x^2 f''(0) + \ldots$$ For functions of two variables, $$f(x,y) = f(\mathbf 0) + x f_x(\mathbf 0) + yf_y (\mathbf 0) + \frac{1}{2}\big(x^2 f_{xx}(\mathbf 0) + xyf_{xy}(\mathbf 0) + yx f_{yx}(\mathbf 0) + y^2 f_{yy}(\mathbf 0)\big) + \ldots$$ In index notation $$f(\mathbf r) = f(\mathbf 0) + r^i\big( \partial_i f\big)(\mathbf 0) + \frac{1}{2} r^j r^k \big(\partial_j \partial_k f\big)(\mathbf 0) + \ldots $$

In each term, the dummy indices are summed over. Strictly speaking, there is nothing wrong with reusing dummy indices in different terms (so we could write the second term as $r^i r^j\partial_i\partial_j$ without risk of ambiguity) but it's not a bad thing to avoid any potential confusion by not doing so.


The set of all $n\times n$ Hermitian matrices is a real vector space of dimension $n^2$. Letting $t_a$ be a basis of this space for $a=1,\ldots, n^2$, one could write an arbitrary $n\times n$ Hermitian matrix $A$ as $$A = \sum_{a=1}^{n^2} \theta^a t_a$$ for some $\theta^a \in \mathbb R$. The matrix exponential $$U = \exp\left[i A\right] = \exp\left[i\sum_a \theta^a t_a\right]$$ is a unitary matrix whose power series expansion about the point $\boldsymbol \theta = \mathbf 0$ is $$U = \mathbb I + i \sum_{a=1}^{n^2} \theta^a t_a - \sum_{b=1}^{n^2}\sum_{c=1}^{n^2} \theta^b \theta^c t_a t_b + \ldots $$

The product $t_at_b$ is not generally Hermitian if $[t_a,t_b]\neq 0$. However, noting the symmetry in the sum we could define $$t_{bc} \equiv \frac{1}{2}(t_bt_c+t_ct_b)$$

and then write $$U = \mathbb I + i \sum_{a=1}^{n^2}\theta^a t_a - \sum_{b=1}^{n^2} \sum_{c=1}^{n^2} \theta^b \theta^c t_{bc} + \ldots $$ where now the $t_a$'s and the $t_{bc}$'s are all Hermitian (for each $a,b,c= 1,\ldots, n^2$).

It turns out that at least in a connected neighborhood of the identity element, all $n\times n$ unitary matrices can be written in this way. This is what Weinberg is doing.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The $xy$ term in your second expansion should have a factor of 2. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Ghoster I thought it better to explicitly distinguish between the $xy$ and $yx$ terms (though they are numerically equal) for more immediate compatibility with the following expressions. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ Whoops, sorry. I missed that $yx$ term. (BTW, I upvoted.) $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Ghoster No worries :) $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Jun 8, 2023 at 23:29
0
$\begingroup$

A summation over those indices is intended. Since $a$ goes from $1$ to $Dim\big[Lie(T)\big]$ you can put the parameters into vector form and the generators as Lie-algebra valued vectors (ie, vectors having as components vectors of the Lie Algebra). Your summation can be intended as:

$\theta^at_a = \langle\vec{\theta}; \vec{t}\rangle$

Where $\langle ●$ ; $●\rangle$ is the inner product. Note that the result is not a scalar since $\vec{t}$ does not have numbers as components but it's a vector in $Lie(T)$.

Since $t_a$ is a vector it has no meaning to square it, so the second order term $t_b t_c$ is just the 2-tensor given by the (Lie) product of two generators. Denoting the product between the vectors as $\star$ you can understand the second term as:

$\big(\langle\vec{\theta}; \vec{t}\rangle\big)\star\big(\langle\vec{\theta}; \vec{t}\rangle\big)$

This is the Lie multiplication of the two vectors given by $ \langle\vec{\theta}; \vec{t}\rangle$ which in a Lie algebra it's again a vector of the algebra.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.