0
$\begingroup$

Equation 180 of Aravos' notes gives: $$t(\mathbf{d})\psi(\mathbf{r})t^\dagger(\mathbf{d})=\psi(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{d})$$

Where $t(\mathbf{d})$ is the magnetic translation operator. Why does this operator act on both sides of the state? It makes sense if it was an operator instead of a state because then if it acted on a translated state, it would be untranslated, acted on by the operator in the untranslated basis, then translated back.

Or is this just an overuse of notation where $\psi$ doesn't represent a state $\left|\psi\right>$ with the $\mathbf{r}$ showing that it is untranslated and not in a basis?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Didn’t look at the notes, but this is standard notation for second quantization. $\psi$ is an annihilation operator so that: $$ \psi(r)|r\rangle =|0\rangle $$ The action on the kets: $$ t(d)|r\rangle =|r+d\rangle $$ is equivalent to the action the operators: $$ t(d)\psi(r)t(d)^{-1}=\psi(r+d) $$ The correspondence between the two is spatial analogue of the equivalence between the Schrödinger picture and the Heisenberg picture for time.

Hope this helps.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.