0
$\begingroup$

I have an old cosmology book in which the scale factor is expressed in the Roberston-Walker metric as:

$\mathrm{d} s^2=c^2 \mathrm{~d} t^2-R(t)^2 \mathrm{~d} l^2$ with: $\mathrm{d} l^2=\dfrac{\mathrm{d} r^2}{1-k r^2}+r^2\left(\mathrm{~d} \theta^2+\ sin ^2 \theta \mathrm{d} \phi^2\right)$

Now, I mainly see the notation $a(t)$ to designate the scale factor, which is 1 when $t=t_0$.

To try to make the connection with the first notation, I deduce that $a(t)=R(t) / R_0$. But if I take that, I take automatically the comoving distance (and not just the comoving coordinates) that appears:

$$ \mathrm{d} s^2=c^2 \mathrm{~d} t^2-\frac{R(t)^2}{R_0^2} \frac{\mathrm{d}\left(R_0^2\, r\right)^2}{1-k r^2}+(R_0\, r)^2\left(\mathrm{~d} \theta^2+\sin ^2 \theta \mathrm{d } \phi^2\right) $$ When I say comoving distance, I mean physical distance. to t=to, i.e. $: \mathrm{d} l=R 0\times r$.

But the problem is that the coordinate r contained in the denominator $1-k r^2$ always remains a coordinate and not a comoving distance ( i.e. $\mathrm{d} l=R_0 \times r$ ), which means that I end up with a hybrid expression having comoving coordinates and a coordinate in the denominator of $1-k r^2$.

So Finally, which is the most common choice into the cosmologist community ? :

  1. $a(t)=R(t)/R_0$ dimensionless and $R(t)$ and $R_0$ are distances and $r$ is dimensionless ?

OR

  1. $a(t)$ is length dimension and $r$ is coordinate ?

EDIT 1: @MadMax. Is there a link between space curvature $\dfrac{k}{R_0^2}$ present into FLRW metric and the term $\Omega_k=-\dfrac{k\,c^2}{H_0^2\,R_0^2}$ present in Friedmann equation ?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I don't see a problem. The denominator $$1-k r^2$$ can be rewritten as $$1-\frac{k}{R_0^2} (R_0r)^2$$ then $\frac{k}{R_0^2}$ is the curvature constant (of length dimension -2) of the space.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, could you tell what is the most widespread convention taken by cosmologists ( a(t) dimensionless and r length or the contrary) ? $\endgroup$
    – guizmo133
    Jun 7, 2023 at 4:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dimensionless $a(t)$ is more widely adopted. See wiki page here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$
    – MadMax
    Jun 7, 2023 at 15:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.