1
$\begingroup$

In Sec. 8.7 of this Applied Conformal Field Theory, Ginsparg discusses the space of $1+1$ dimensional CFTs with central charge $c=1$, and the summary is in figure 14. Essentially there are two continuous families of such CFTs, one along the horizontal axis and the other along the vertical axis, together with 3 other theories labeled by T, O and I in the figure.

The theories along the horizontal axis are free compact bosons on a circle, which in the condensed matter terminology are also known as Luttinger liquids. It is known that all these theories have a common internal unitary $(U(1)_1\times U(1)_2)\rtimes Z_2$ symmetry. If we denote the compact boson by $\theta$ and its dual variable by $\phi$, the actions of the $(U(1)_1\times U(1)_2)\rtimes Z_2$ symmetry are

\begin{equation} \begin{split} &U(1)_1: \theta\rightarrow\theta+\alpha, \phi\rightarrow\phi,\\ &U(1)_2: \theta\rightarrow\theta, \phi\rightarrow\phi+\alpha,\\ &Z_2: \theta\rightarrow-\theta, \phi\rightarrow-\phi \end{split} \end{equation}

For these theories, there can be enlarged symmetry when the compactification radius takes special values. For example, in figure 14 if the compactification radius is $1/\sqrt{2}$, the theory has an $SO(4)$ symmetry.

My question is: What is the internal unitary symmetry that is in common for all theories along the vertical axis?

As I know, an example of the theory in the vertical axis is two decoupled Ising CFTs, whose internal unitary symmetry seems to be $Z_2\times Z_2\times Z_2$, where two of the $Z_2$'s are the $Z_2$ symmetry of each individual Ising CFT, and the last $Z_2$ exchanges the two copies of Ising CFTs. Do all theories along the vertical axis have a $Z_2\times Z_2\times Z_2$ symmetry? If they do, do they have an even larger internal unitary symmetry that is in common?

My other question is: What are the symmetries of the T, O and I theories?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/27763/2451 $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Apr 30, 2023 at 14:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic Thank you for the comments. I have to admit that I am not an expert in CFT, and I am not able to read off the symmetry of the $c=1$ CFTs from the related question. Could you be more explicit about these symmetries? A more specific question is: Is it correct that most of the $c=1$ CFTs not on the horizontal axis have no continuous internal unitary symmetry? $\endgroup$ May 1, 2023 at 12:52

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.