0
$\begingroup$

Consider a current-carrying loop. I am trying to work out the magnetic field at the a certain point on the wire due to the other points of the wire. I will call this point P. I am trying to calculate this to find out the effect of the current on the change in radius of the loop. It seems quite obvious that the radius will increase because the magnetic force will act outwards on the wire.

Using Biot-Savart law, I eventually reached the following equation:

$$B = \frac{\mu_0I}{4R\pi} \int_0^\pi \!\frac{1}{1- \cos\theta}\,d\theta$$

where the direction of B is obtained via right-hand grip rule, and $\theta$ is the angle subtended by the line from the centre to P and the line from the centre to another point along the wire that I am integrating over

The result is infinity.

Upon relooking at the problem, I realised that this could be because I am considering the effect of the magnetic field from parts of the wire very very close to point P.

And then, because of the inverse square relationship between $|r|$ and $B$ in the original Biot-Savart law, and $|r|$ tends to 0, then $B$ tends to infinity.

But I also see that such points should have a $\theta$ that tends to 0, resulting in a $\sin\theta$ (from $dl \times \hat{r}$) that tends to 0. I think this and the aforementioned inverse square effect should cancel out.

So why am I still getting infinity? How I do I resolve this problem/contradiction in the qualitative understanding of the problem? (I am not so concerned over the equation)

PS: Yes, I know there seem to be other questions asking the same thing, but those either do not consider a loop, or are focusing on a different effect (individual electrons in the wire having an effect on each other)

PPS: I apologise if my understanding of calculus may not be very good

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Biot-Savart does produce such discontinuities unless one integrates in 3 dimensions. The full Biot-Savart equation is $B(r)=\frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}\int\int\int_V \frac{(J \times \hat r)dV}{|r|^2}$, a three dimensional integral. If one considers a infinitesimal cylindrical shell around a wire with some radius $R$, and some length $dL$ and some thickness $dT$, its volume is $\pi R^2\ dL\ dT$ and we can that the contribution of that shell to the final integral will approach $\pi(J \times \hat r)\ dL$, with no pesky $|r|$ in the denominator.

If you think about the 2d case, consider that what you're really computing is an infinitely thin ribbon of perfect conductor -- a construct which easily generates discontinuities. That nice, straight forward cylindrical shell gets stretched in one direction infinitely far, and we no longer get the $R^2$ term we need.

Incidentally, this issue is problematic for numeric integrators. This cancellation only happens if all of the integrals are computed analytically. The computations blow up when one integrates numerically. One of the popular integration methods, Yee's method, deals with this by computing the electric and magnetic fields on separate lattices, rather than on the same lattice for both. This allows us to guarantee that there is some minimal distance between the elements of the magnetic field computation and the elements of the electric field computation, sidestepping this issue entierly. Of course this does introduce some artifacts which can become troublesome at high frequencies, but it's the kind of thing we have to do to avoid the issue numerically.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.