4
$\begingroup$

I want to visualise an test EM field in Kerr spacetime (I want to plot the integral field lines). The field is a test field in the sense, that it doesn't change the background (metric).

Could anyone point me to some more technical literature or some Mathematica/python code that would help me?

What I thought I would do: I have the field $F^{\alpha \beta}$ in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates. I then took the ZAMO tetrad (observer family) $e^\alpha_a$ with $e^\mu_0 = u^\mu$ is the for velocity normalized to $$u_\alpha u^\alpha = -1.$$ I then projected the EM tensor onto the tetrad $$ F^{\alpha \beta} e_\alpha^a e_\beta^a = F^{ab} $$ and from this I took the standard definition of electric field $$ E^\alpha = -\frac{1}{2} F^{\alpha \beta }u_\beta \implies E^a = -\frac{1}{2} F^{a0} $$ So now I have the electric field with respects to the ZAMO tetrad.

But how do i visualize this? The tetrad is still expressed in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates (which are like spheriodial coordinates). Do I have to transform into Kerr-Schild coordinates which reduce to cartesian (minkowski) in the flat-spacetime limit?

I hope it's obvious from the context, but I used Greek letters $\alpha \beta$ to denote the indices with respect to coordinates and Latin letters $ab$ to denote indices with respect to tetrad.

For example I would like to plot something like figure 2 and figure 3 in this article.

Edit: The question can also be reduced to - do I always need to transform to cartesian like coordinates when plotting fields on curved background.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I am speaking only of the visualization aspects here - I have been plotting geodesics in the Kerr metric for some time now. Firstly the easy part, I just use the conversion on this page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyer%E2%80%93Lindquist_coordinates. For the visualization, I use something like "gnuplot -p -e "set style data vector; splot 'vector_fields.data' using 1:2:3:4:5:6" where the format is x,y,z,dx,dy,dz, if that helps. $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Mar 30, 2023 at 13:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean the equations for $x,y,z$? Aren't those only for the case $M\to 0$? $\endgroup$
    – Nitaa a
    Commented Mar 30, 2023 at 18:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ On closer inspection, the lower case "m" is not defined anywhere. If they really mean "M", then that statement (M -> 0) is nonsense since "a" is defined as J/M, where M is the mass. Looks like a bit of a mess TBH, but I have always used that transformation for non-zero "M"! I'll take another look tomorrow. $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Mar 30, 2023 at 19:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ OK I've just checked Visser's "The Kerr Spacetime", arxiv.org/abs/0706.0622. Looks like the wiki page has garbled equations 59 with 60-62, but the (M -> 0) part is only applicable to the derivation of the coordinate transformation. I think this is the right conclusion, what do you think? (EDIT haha that is exactly the reference quoted in the wiki page!) $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Mar 30, 2023 at 19:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ OK, now I see what you were asking: x, y, z are the coordinates, and dx, dy, dz are the field components. My other comments are still valid though. $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Mar 30, 2023 at 21:13

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Nataa a asked: "I want to visualise an test EM field in Kerr spacetime [...] But how do i visualize this? [...] Could anyone point me to some more technical literature or some Mathematica/python code that would help me?"

The Mathematica code for the $\rm \{\lambda,z\}$-plot

magnetic and electric field lines

is at kerr.newman.yukterez.net at 17) streamplot, also see doi:10.1103/physreva.36.5118

For the vertical and horizontal magnetic and electric field lines we have

$\rm M_z=Q \ Im[(z-ia)/\sigma] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M_{\lambda}=Q \ Im[\lambda/\sigma]$

$\rm E_z=Q \ Re[(z-ia)/\sigma] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ E_{\lambda}=Q \ Re[\lambda/\sigma]$

$\rm \sigma=[\lambda^2+(z-ia)^2]^{3/2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \lambda=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$

In a streamplot you'd plot $\rm \{M_z, M_{\lambda}\}$ as vector, and in a contourplot its magnitude.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.