Someone once told me that with reversible computers there is no energy cost for the computation itself, there is only a cost for running the hardware. But is this true in practice, or is it only an idealization?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
4
-
6$\begingroup$ "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different." $\endgroup$– John DotyMar 19 at 20:52
-
$\begingroup$ Maybe a better fit for Computer Science. $\endgroup$– StephenG - Help UkraineMar 19 at 20:54
-
$\begingroup$ You are asking about the Landauer principle. Imho this is an ineradicable myth coming from a confusion of Shannon entropy with thermodynamical entropy. $\endgroup$– Kurt G.Mar 19 at 21:06
-
$\begingroup$ Nobody has built a reversible computer yet. In principle, we know there is a theoretical minimum energy cost for non-reversible computations, and we know reversible computers could be a loophole to bypass it. But nobody's actually built one that does. Our best computers today still use zillions of times more energy than the theoretical limit $\endgroup$– user253751Mar 20 at 1:24
Add a comment
|