0
$\begingroup$

I am confused about the vector and dual vector in the tetrad formalism. Start from Schwarzschild metric

$$\mathrm{d} s^2=\left(1-\frac{2m}{r}\right)dt^2 - \left(1-\frac{2m}{r}\right)^{-1}\mathrm{d} r^2-r^2(\mathrm{d}\theta^2+sin^2\theta \mathrm{d}\phi^2).$$ Change to the advanced Eddington-Finkelstein coordinate it becomes

$$\mathrm{d} s^{2}=\left (1-\frac{2m}{r} \right ) \mathrm{d} v^{2}-2 dv dr-r^{2}\left(\mathrm{d} \theta^{2}+\sin ^{2} \theta \mathrm{d} \phi^{2}\right).$$ Then I could use it to construct the following null tetrad.

$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l} \ell ^{a}=(\frac{\partial}{\partial r})^a, \\ n^{a}=-(\frac{\partial}{\partial v})^a-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{2 m}{r}\right) (\frac{\partial}{\partial r})^a, \\ m^{a}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} r}\left((\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta})^a+\frac{i}{\sin \theta} (\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi})^a\right), \\ \bar{m}^{a}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} r}\left((\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta})^a-\frac{i}{\sin \theta} (\frac{\partial}{\partial \phi})^a\right). \end{array} \end{equation}$

The metric with respect to the tetrad is

$\begin{equation} g_{i j}=\left[\begin{array}{rrrr} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \end{array}\right]. \end{equation}$

What would be the form of dual vectors with respect to $\{v,r,\theta,\phi\}$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Where did these equations come from? You have an index of the left hand sides of the equations but no on the right hand side... Such equations/definition are just plain wrong. What I think you should have written $$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l} \ell=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \\ n=-\frac{\partial}{\partial v}-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{2 m}{r}\right) \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \\ m=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} r}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}+\frac{i}{\sin \theta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}\right), \\ \bar{m}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} r}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}-\frac{i}{\sin \theta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}\right). \end{array} \end{equation}$$ Now this perhaps does define some tetrad, if we further define the what are the coordinates (I'm going to assume $(x^0,x^1,x^2,x^3) = (r,v,\theta,\phi)$) and what is the metric. A general tensor $T$ can be written in a coordinate system as $T = T^a \frac{\partial}{\partial x^a}$, where we denote $\frac{\partial}{\partial x^a}$ as the (coordinate) basis.

From this it's obvious what you should have written as $l^a$ since $$ l = \frac{\partial}{\partial r } = l^r \frac{ \partial}{\partial r } $$ Thus your vector $l^\alpha = (1,0,0,0)$. Now if we want to lower these indices, we can, just as always do $$ l_a = g_{a m} l^m = g_{a r}l^r $$ Since $l^r$ is the only non-zero component. For the process for other tetrad vector is practically the same.

Edit: Now that we have the metric, we can finish our calculation of $l_a$. Since the only non-zero metric term with $r$ is $g_{v r}$ the only non-zero term of $l_a$ will be $l_v$

$$ l_v = g_{vr}l^r = -1 $$ So now $$ l_a = -1 \; dv_a $$

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ I edit the question, It should be more clear now. $\endgroup$
    – David Shaw
    Commented Mar 10, 2023 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited the answer $\endgroup$
    – Nitaa a
    Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ I think $g_{vr}$ should be one, beause the -2 is $g_{vr}+g_{rv}$. Actually, it still confused me. Why do we use metric in $\{v,r,\theta,\phi\}$ to lower the index, rather than using the metric of the tetrad to lower the index? $\endgroup$
    – David Shaw
    Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry you are right about the factor. $\endgroup$
    – Nitaa a
    Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 23:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I already figure out this problem. Using abstract index a, and b to represent the vector index. $l_{a}=g_{ab}l^b$, as $l^b=(\partial/\partial r)^b$, $l_{a}=g_{ar}l^r=g_{vr}(dv)_a$. Thank you! $\endgroup$
    – David Shaw
    Commented Mar 14, 2023 at 15:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.