0
$\begingroup$

I know what you’re thinking, “Not another question on Relativistic Mass.” I’ve spent the better part of a day going down the general and special relativity rabbit holes, and I can not find where this concept has been asked, so here goes.

If a very small, massive object was to be traveling close enough to light speed that it’s relativistic mass increased by several orders of magnitude, would it create gravitational effects relative to a stationary observer?

To be more specific, would an object with the resting mass of a paper clip be able to build up enough kinetic energy that it could bend spacetime, and pull something as massive as the Earth? The Earth being the stationary observer.

As a bonus question, would the near light speed object’s increase in relativistic mass cause gravitational lensing, observable from the stationary object?

A couple things I am aware of: I know the paperclip is only effected by its rest mass; I am purely interested in the frame of the stationary observer. The scientific community now uses “energy density” in place of “relativistic mass”, but I did not know how else to phrase the question. Similar questions have been asked, but every question I could find was asking about objects moving at the same relative speed, rather than one stationary and one moving.

Lastly, I am aware that, given the difference in velocity, the gravitational interaction between the two objects would only last fractions of a millisecond.

I am still a newer student of relativity, so there may be concepts I am unaware of or have misunderstood. I am still not 100% grasping how tensors fit in to this problem. Feel free to educate me as I am here to learn.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The question seems to be whether a small object could have an arbitrarily large gravitational effect if it were moving fast enough. I would say the answer is yes. However, that effect will not be the same as a stationary body with the same mass as the relativistic mass of the small object.

In general relativity, mass and energy affect the gravitational field via the stress energy tensor $T^{\mu \nu}$. This appears in the Einstein field equations $G_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu} = \kappa T^{\mu \nu}$, relating the tensor to the curvature of space-time (expressed in $g_{\mu \nu}$ and $G_{\mu \nu}$).

You don't need to be too concerned with the (very complicated) mathematical details of this for now. However, it is helpful to note that $T^{0 0}$ represents relativistic mass density. This term is responsible for the Newtonian gravity in the classical limit. It can be increased arbitrarily as $v \to c$ for the small body.

That isn't the only effect increasing $v$ has on $T^{\mu \nu}$, though. Other terms representing mass and momentum fluxes will also grow. So the gravitational forces exerted by the small object won't be the same as for a very large body. For example, effects analogous to magnetism (which are usually negligible) will appear as $v$ increases. You will not end up with a black hole just by increasing $v$ for the small object.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ So, if I understand your answer correctly, even if $[T^{00}+m]_{paperclip}=m_{earth}$ the effect on spacetime would not be identical? Would the $T^{00}$ produced by a $v$ approaching $c$ create a gravitational effect in the form of a propagating wave, similar to a boat traveling through water? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 16, 2023 at 1:44
  • $\begingroup$ The $m$ appears in the expression for $T^{00}$, but you understand correctly that the effects on spacetime are not identical even where this term is equal for the planet and paperclip*. However, we will not see gravitational waves because the paperclip has constant velocity. $\endgroup$
    – FTT
    Commented Feb 19, 2023 at 11:47
  • $\begingroup$ *Strictly speaking, $T^{00}$ is related to rest mass density ($=\rho_0 \gamma^2$) and we'd consider the case where its integral was equal for the paperclip and planet. $\endgroup$
    – FTT
    Commented Feb 19, 2023 at 11:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.