2
$\begingroup$

Polchinski states in his equation 2.6.14 (in his book String Theory Vol. 1, Introduction to the Bosonic String) that for charges $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ the following equation holds, where $j_i$ is the corresponding current:

$$ [Q_1,Q_2]=\oint\!\frac{\mathrm{d}w}{2\pi i}\text{Res}_{z\rightarrow w}j_1(z)j_2(w).\tag{2.6.14} $$

Now, for the $bc$ conformal field theory, one find that $\{b_m,c_n\}=\delta_{m,-n}$, which can be shown if above equations holds for the anticommutator.

The equation 2.6.14 is stated with the commutator. Why can it also be used with the anticommutator of $b$ and $c$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Where is it said that it holds for the commutator $[b_m,c_n]$? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Feb 11, 2023 at 20:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic: There's a catch: It is for example stated in the solutions of UChicago to the course PHYS 483, where question 2.12 from Polchinski was part of a problem set. The question is to show that $\{b_m,c_n\}=\delta_{m,-n}$ and the solution just states that the relation 2.6.14 holds in this case also for the commutator instead of the anti-commutator. Maybe the solution is wrong, but the desired result actually follows. This is why I am asking. $\endgroup$
    – kalle
    Commented Feb 11, 2023 at 20:43
  • $\begingroup$ homes.psd.uchicago.edu/~sethi/Teaching/P483-W2018/p483-sol3.pdf, Page 4, eq. 29. $\endgroup$
    – kalle
    Commented Feb 11, 2023 at 22:22

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

To generalize the bosonic eq. (2.6.14) to operators with arbitrary definite Grassmann parity, the commutator on the LHS of eq. (2.6.14) should be replaced with a supercommutator. Similar superization should be done with the implicitly written radial operator ordering ${\cal R}$ on the RHS of eq. (2.6.14). For details, see e.g. my related Phys.SE answer here.

References:

  1. J. Polchinski, String Theory Vol. 1, 1998; eq. (2.6.14).
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.