0
$\begingroup$

I recently saw a question:

A baryon has quark structure $dss$ and it decays via the weak interaction. Which of the following is a possible decay product?

  • $\Lambda^0+\pi^{-1}$
  • $n + \pi^{-1}$
  • $\Lambda^0+e^-$
  • $K^++K^0$

It's easy to rule out the last two. The fourth option has charge $+1$ but the initial baryon had a charge of $-1$, so that's no good. The lepton number is originally $0$ but in the third option it is $+1$, and that also can't be the case. However, I don't know how to distinguish between the first two. Both have the right overall charge, the right baryon number, the right lepton number. Other conservation laws such as energy and momentum are irrelevant here, and since this is a weak interaction the fact that strangeness isn't conserved doesn't bother me.

I am pretty sure the answer is: $\Lambda^0+\pi^{-1}$, just on the basis that I know the following is possible: $$s\to u+d+\overline{u}$$Hence: $$dss\to d+s+u+d+\overline{u}\to uds+d\overline{u}=\Lambda^0+\pi^{-1}$$Should be possible. But I figure that: $$dss\to d+\color{red}{s}+u+d+\overline{u}\to d+d+u+\color{red}{d}+\overline{u}+(\color{red}{u}+\color{red}{\overline{u}})\to n+\pi^{-1}+\text{annihilation}$$Is a reasonable thing to occur, so that the second option is reasonable.

Coming from the limited A-level knowledge, I don't know how to thoroughly rule out the possibility of the second decay product. Indeed, I'm sure the strange quark can interact in ways I've not learnt about, so the excuse: "I can't see how it could make that" isn't something to rely on: although it feels weird to include an annihilation as part of the decay chain, it might still be possible through means that I'm unware of.

Question: What conservation laws, or general principles, am I missing which could help me decide whether or not $dss\to n+\pi^{-1}$ is possible? I'm pretty sure this interaction ticks all the $A$-level boxes.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Have you leaned that doubly weak interactions (with the exchange of two Ws) are fantastically less likely than singly weak ones? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2023 at 15:14
  • $\begingroup$ @CosmasZachos No I haven’t, but now I have! I guess that clears it up. Your advice is then: “out of all sensible candidates, pick the option with the fewest weak interactions”? $\endgroup$
    – FShrike
    Commented Feb 5, 2023 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ So that the other one is possible, maybe, just highly unlikely? $\endgroup$
    – FShrike
    Commented Feb 5, 2023 at 15:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. Yes. You got it. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2023 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ @CosmasZachos Great. Thank you for that advice, I will try to remember it. Trust AQA physics to examine something that isn’t taught! $\endgroup$
    – FShrike
    Commented Feb 5, 2023 at 15:28

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You are discussing the decays of the charged $Ξ$ baryon. It is a part of the baryon decuplet.

baryon decuplet

$Ξ$ has strangeness $s=-2$

You can see in the measured data in the PDG that the title decay is among the "forbidden" s=2 reactions, i.e. both strangeness units cannot be lost in one reaction , which nevertheless have been searched for, and limits given.

The "forbidden" means that in the standard model of particle physics $Δ(s)=2$, as the one in the title, reactions are not possible. Searching for them is an experimental handle for discovering new physics and higher level theories.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What does $\Delta(s)=2$ mean? $\endgroup$
    – FShrike
    Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 7:12
  • $\begingroup$ see edited answer $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 8:12
  • $\begingroup$ Right, the change in strangeness would be $2$, and this is apparently impossible. By the way, your link is for a file on your home computer, it is not a web link. $\endgroup$
    – FShrike
    Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 11:46
  • $\begingroup$ @FShrike Corrected link, sorry about that. It is only with the EDGE I can get correct addresses for .pdf. Firefox just copies into my user $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 17:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.