I have a map $\mathcal{N}$ from the space of two-qubit subnormalised density matrices $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{H}_2 \otimes \mathcal{H}_2)$ to itself (positive operators with trace between 0 and 1). Notice that it is not necessarily a physical one (e.g. it may be nonlinear, that's perfectly fine). I know $\mathcal{N}$ is

  1. linear for all product states $\rho_A \otimes \rho_B$. By this I mean $\mathcal{N} \left( \sum_{ijkl} c_{ik}d_{jl} |i\rangle \langle k| \otimes |j \rangle \langle l | \right)= \sum_{ijkl} c_{ik}d_{jl} \mathcal{N} \left( |i\rangle \langle k| \otimes |j \rangle \langle l | \right)$ for every $\rho_A = \sum_{ik}c_{ik}|i\rangle \langle k|, \rho_B = \sum_{jl}d_{jl}|j \rangle \langle l| \in \mathcal{S}(\mathcal{H}_2)$

  2. continuous on the whole space of two-qubit density matrices $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{H}_2 \otimes \mathcal{H}_2)$.

Does it automatically follow that $\mathcal{N}$ has to be linear over all $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{H}_2 \otimes \mathcal{H}_2)$?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What does "linear for all product states" mean? Can you write a formula? $\endgroup$ Jan 24 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ Do you require the map to be trace-preserving (i.e. $\mathcal S$ are positive operators with trace one)? Generally, I think being more specific (formulas!) in the question would be rather helpful. $\endgroup$ Jan 24 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ You're right, I could have stated the question more carefully. Hope the edit helps clarify what I mean. $\endgroup$
    – bb2002
    Jan 24 at 13:42
  • $\begingroup$ We do not require the map to be trace preserving $\endgroup$
    – bb2002
    Jan 24 at 13:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well, but then $\mathcal N$cannot be defined on $|i\rangle\langle k|\otimes |j\rangle\langle l|$, no? What I mean is that you write " map [...] from the space of two-qubit subnormalised density matrices [...]to itself". But if I am not completely mistaken, then $|i\rangle\langle k| \otimes |j\rangle\langle l|$ is not from the domain of the map. $\endgroup$ Jan 24 at 14:16

1 Answer 1



First, choose a continuous map $f(\rho)$ into the reals, such that

  1. $f(\rho)$ is zero on all separable states (the convex hull of product states)

  2. $f(\rho)>0$ for all other states.

  3. $f(\rho)\le 1$.

Such a map exists -- e.g., it could be the (trace norm) distance to the set of separable states, or some nice entanglement measure (for two qubits: negativity, entanglement of formation, ... ), suitably normalized.

Then, construct $$\mathcal N(\rho) = f(\rho) \sigma_1 + (1-f(\rho))\sigma_2$$ for any two states $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$.

This map will be linear on the separable states (in fact, constant, namely $\sigma_1$), and thus on all product states. On the other hand, it will not be linear in general. In particular, any separable state can also be decomposed as a convex combination which contains entangled states, $\rho=\sum p_i \rho_i$ with some $\rho$ entangled, and $\mathcal N$ will not be linear over such a decomposition, as $\mathcal N(\rho)=0$, while $\mathcal N(\rho_i)\ne0$ for some $i$, and $p_i>0$.

  • $\begingroup$ I started writing this answer before the OP clarified in their comments. If the map needs not be trace preserving $\mathcal N(\rho) = f(\rho)\sigma_1$ will do. $\endgroup$ Jan 24 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ ... or $\mathcal N(\rho) = f(\rho)\rho$, for that matter. $\endgroup$ Jan 24 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.