2
$\begingroup$

Imagine that I have a quantity $F_{ab}$ multiplying the stress tensor $T^{ab}$:

\begin{equation} F_{ab} T^{ab}. \end{equation} There is also a metric, say $h_{ab}$. If I want to write the above equation in terms of the trace, $T^a_a = T^{ab}h_{ab}$ (I think this is the right definition). Then can I write \begin{equation} F_{ab} T^{ab} h_{ab}h^{ab} = F_{ab}T^c_c h^{ab} \end{equation} or is this not an allowed computation? Since the summation convention is implicit, I changed notation from $T^a_a \to T^c_c$.

Edit: so it seems like the problem is that the indices appears too many times. But then the question is if a trace could be introduced on the RHS.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Indices ought to appear two times only. $\endgroup$ Jan 23 at 9:41
  • $\begingroup$ Could you provide a bit more detail on how you got to this calculation? While this might initially seem superfluous, knowing a bit more about the context might help us understand what you are trying to do and what is going wrong. $\endgroup$ Jan 23 at 10:24

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

You cannot write $F_{ab}T^{ab}$ only in terms of the trace $T^a_a$. A simple argument is that $$F_{ab}T^{ab}=F_{00}T^{00}+F_{01}T^{01}+\ldots + F_{10}T^{10}+\ldots + F_{dd}T^{dd}$$ involves all the matrix elements $T_{ab}$. In the special case of a diagonal metric, the trace involves only the diagonal elements $T_{aa}$. Therefore, $F_{ab}T^{ab}$ cannot be expressed only in terms of the trace.

In your calculation, you cannot use more than twice the same index: $$F_{ab}T^{ab}=F_{ab}T^{ab}=F_{ab}T^{a}_{\ \ c}h^{cb}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Is it possible to introduce the trace on the RHS? $\endgroup$ Jan 23 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think so. $\endgroup$
    – Christophe
    Jan 23 at 10:48
0
$\begingroup$

Simply to find out the trace $T^{ab}h_{ab}$ works and gives a scalar (easy to visualize when the metric is diagonal).

To get the RHS, try $F_{ab}T^{ab}h_{bc}h^{cd}\delta_d^b$=$F_{ab}T^a_ch^{bc}$.

Now do not rewrite the dummy $a$ to $c$ since new $c$ will be different than the esisting one, it becomes $F_{c'b}T^{c'}_ch^{bc}$

(Considered only symmetric tensors)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.