Different definitions of recession velocity I have encountered two definitions of recession velocity that seem to refer to different concepts, but I am wondering whether the two are actually the same.
Definition 1
If we denote the scale factor, that measures the expansion of the universe, by $a=a(t)$, then we can express the physical velocity of an object in terms of comoving coordinates as follows, since $\vec{r}_{phys}=a\vec{r}$:
$$\dot{\vec{r}}_{phys}=\dot{a}\vec{r}+a\dot{\vec{r}}=\vec{v}_{rec}+\vec{v}_{pec}$$
where the first term is called the recession velocity and the second one is the peculiar velocity.
Definition 2
When doing the calculations that lead to the Hubble-Lemaître law, the recession velocity of a light source is considered to be:
$$v=cz$$
where $z$ is the redshift.
Are these two concepts different, or is there a way to obtain one expression from the other?
 A: Let us take the FRW metric as
$$ds^2 = -c^2dt^2+R(t)^2[d\chi^2+S^2_k(\chi)d\Omega^2]$$
We can see that the radial distance $(d\Omega = 0)$ along a constant time-slice $(dt=0)$ is $$ds = Rd\chi$$ which by integrating we obtain $D = R\chi$.
If you differentiate it, by assuming $\dot{\chi}=0$, we obtain $v=HD$.
where $H=\frac{\dot{R}}{R}$
Now, consider a path of a photon $(ds=0)$ along a radial distance $(d\Omega=0)$. In this case FRW metric becomes $$cdt=R(t)d\chi$$ This equation shows that the he velocity of light is purely a peculiar velocity $c=Rd\chi/dt$.
To calculate the comoving coordinate between two points in the path of the photon, you need to leave $d\chi$ alone and integrate. In result you obtain $$\chi(\bar{z}) = \frac{c}{R_0H_0}\int_0^{\bar{z}}\frac{dz}{E(z)}$$
Now, in the above, we have found out that $v(z) = H_0D(z) \equiv H_0R_0\chi(z)$ where where $v(z)$ and $D(z)$ are the present day velocity and proper distance of a comoving galaxy at redshift $z$.
From here we obtain $$v(\bar{z}) = c\int_0^{\bar{z}}\frac{dz}{E(z)}$$
In very small $z$ values the integral becomes $v \approx cz$ but for large $z$ values it is given by the integral itself.
