0
$\begingroup$

In room acoustics, clarity ($C_{50}$) is defined as $$ C_{50} = 10*\log_{10}{\frac{\int_0^{50ms}p² (t)dt}{\int_{50}^{\infty}p² (t)dt}} $$

and definition ($D_{50}$) is $$ D_{50} = \frac{\int_0^{50ms}p² (t)dt}{\int_{0}^{\infty}p² (t)dt} * 100$$

So clarity is defined in deciblels, while definition is just a percentage. A lot of books say the relation between the two is: $$ C_{50} = 10 * \log_{10}{\frac{D_{50}}{1 - D_{50}}} $$

I tried a lot of different substitutions and using the property that $\int_{0}^{\infty}p² (t)dt$ = $\int_{0}^{50}p² (t)dt + \int_{50}^{\infty}p² (t)dt$, but I can't seem to derive the relation between these two parameters. I'd be glad if someone could help me understand this a bit better.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ "help me understand this a bit better" is not a question. Are you asking for the mathematical relation b/w the two? Please ask a (conceptual) question. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – joseph h
    Jan 13 at 0:28
  • $\begingroup$ i want to know how to write $C_{50}$ in terms of $D_{50}$ $\endgroup$
    – willsbit
    Jan 13 at 0:31
  • $\begingroup$ This is not the kind of question suitable for this site. There is no conceptual issue but just a request for help with math. If you write the integral from $0$ to $50ms$ as $A$, the integral from $50ms$ to $\infty$ as $B$, the integral from $0$ to $\infty$ as $A+B$, starting from the definition of $C_{50}$ and the formula you want to check, it should not be too difficult to verify their identity. $\endgroup$ Jan 13 at 9:26

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is simply down to the confused way different sources are treating the $D_{50}$ quantity.

If you omit the multiplication by $100$ in the formula you gave for $D_{50}$ and substitute that into the $C_{50}$ formula you get the desired result.

It's the factor of $100$ to make a percentage that's causing the issue. It's only there to be "human friendly" and give a percentage and shouldn't be there from a mathematical point of view.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ thanks! I omitted the *100 and managed to derive the correct formula $\endgroup$
    – willsbit
    Jan 13 at 1:23

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.