1
$\begingroup$

In a solved example in Cengel's Thermodynamics text,

enter image description here

As they have stated, we don't know if the refrigerant is in compressed liquid form. In the case that it is, it's not necessary that the volume the liquid will occupy will be the entire 80L vessel. But that is what they've assumed when making the calculation

They, what feels like to me, first implicitly assumed that it is in the saturated mixture phase, checked if this value lies between $v_f$ and $v_g$ and used that to confirm that it is. This seems off to me.

enter image description here

EDIT: To diagrammatically clarify my confusion

enter image description here

As can be seen here, $v_{avg}$ is a changing quantity. It's value can vary along the horizontal line from $v_f$ to $v_g$

However, if it is defined as being equal to $V/m$, where V represents the volume of a rigid vessel, then we can see that since neither V nor m change, that this quantity would be fixed.

Here's my speculation: During this step of the derivation,

enter image description here

V, which equals the sum, doesn't actually represent the tank volume.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Note: I have converted the part after "EDIT" into a new question. Since it's more general and not completely/directly linked to the question, which is more about this specific solved example $\endgroup$
    – xasthor
    Commented Jan 8, 2023 at 8:38

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

The specific volume they have calculated is the average value for the contents of the vessel, weighted in terms of mass fraction of liquid and mass fraction of vapor.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It's all clear now. Thank you for being so patient with me $\endgroup$
    – xasthor
    Commented Jan 10, 2023 at 9:31
  • $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Jan 11, 2023 at 4:27
0
$\begingroup$

Let $m_L$ represent the mass of liquid in the tank at equilibrium, $m_V$ represent the mass of vapor in the tank at equilibrium, $v_L$ represent the specific volume of the liquid, $m_V$ represent the volume of vapor, and V represent the tank volume. Then $$m_Lv_L+m_Vv_V=V$$If x_V represents the mass fraction of vapor, then $$m_L=m(1-x_V)$$and $$m_V=mx_V$$So, combining these three equations, we have: $$(1-x_V)v_L+x_Vv_V=\frac{V}{m}$$Does this make sense to you and does it answer your question?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I've made an edit to my post to diagrammatically explain my point of confusion. It's at the bottom, following the "EDIT" tag $\endgroup$
    – xasthor
    Commented Jan 8, 2023 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, it has become different/abstracted enough from that original problem that I feel like I should post that as a new question $\endgroup$
    – xasthor
    Commented Jan 8, 2023 at 8:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.