0
$\begingroup$

Take the two Hilbert spaces $ H_1 = H_2 = C^2$

The basis of $H_1$ is : $ \{ | 1 : + \rangle , |1 : - \rangle \} $ and for $H_2$ : $ \{ | 2 : + \rangle , |2 : - \rangle \} $

Forming the composite Hilbert space: $$ H = H_1 \otimes H_2 $$

We get the base of $H$ : $ \{ | 1 : + \rangle \otimes | 2 : + \rangle , | 1 : + \rangle \otimes | 2 : - \rangle , | 1 : - \rangle \otimes | 2 : - \rangle, | 1 : - \rangle \otimes | 2 : + \rangle \} $. Written more simply as $$ \{| + + \rangle , | + - \rangle , | - - \rangle , |- + \rangle \} $$

Let the composite system be in a ket $$ | \Psi \rangle = \dfrac{ |+ - \rangle - | - + \rangle}{\sqrt{2}} $$

I wish to calculate the partial trace of the density operator with respect to $H_2$

$$ \rho_1 = tr_2 \rho = tr_2 | \Psi \rangle \langle \Psi| = \langle 2 : + | \Psi \rangle \langle \Psi | 2 : + \rangle + \langle 2 : - | \Psi \rangle \langle \Psi | 2 : - \rangle $$

I cannot get past this step , since I don't know what: $$\langle 2: + | + - \rangle ?$$

Is it just $ \langle 2: + | 2: - \rangle = 0 $ ?

I know that for a vector space that is the tensor product of two other vector spaces the scalar product is :

$$ (\langle 1:n' |\otimes \langle 2: p' |)| (|1 : n \rangle \otimes |2:p \rangle) = \ \langle 1:n'| 1 : n \rangle \times \langle 2: p' | 2:p \rangle $$

What is then :

$$ \langle 2: p' | (|1 : n \rangle \otimes |2:p \rangle) ? $$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ This is the usual abuse of notation regarding the partial trace, I think. Have a look here, for example. $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2022 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ ah ok , so $ \langle 2 : + | + - \rangle$ is really $( I_{d1} \otimes \langle 2 : + | ) |+ - \rangle $. So $( I_{d1}+ \langle +| ) |+ - \rangle = |1 : +\rangle ( \langle 2:+ | 2: - \rangle ) $ $\endgroup$
    – lohey
    Dec 24, 2022 at 14:35
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, it is hard for me to read this notation (especially in a comment). $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2022 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ $$ \left(\mathbb I_A \otimes \langle \psi| \right) (|\varphi\rangle \otimes|\phi\rangle) = |\varphi\rangle \langle \psi|\phi \rangle \quad $$ is what I meant to say $\endgroup$
    – lohey
    Dec 24, 2022 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, indeed. As I've explained in the linked answer, the notation you encountered (I suppose), is a common abuse of notation (cf. eq. 4 there). $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2022 at 14:46

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Using your notation, you already pointed out that ${|2:+⟩,|2:−⟩}$ form a basis in $𝐻_2$, so $⟨2:+|2:−⟩$ is definitely zero.

Second, you also observed the rule by which the inner product and tensor product interchange, i.e.

$(⟨1:𝑛′|⊗⟨2:𝑝′|)|(|1:𝑛⟩⊗|2:𝑝⟩)= ⟨1:𝑛′|1:𝑛⟩⊗⟨2:𝑝′|2:𝑝⟩ =⟨1:𝑛′|1:𝑛⟩⟨2:𝑝′|2:𝑝⟩$,

where in the last equality the tensor product transforms into scalar product since $⟨1:𝑛′|1:𝑛⟩$ and $⟨2:𝑝′|2:𝑝⟩$ are just numbers.

Exactly the same rule applies to your last equation, the only difference is that there you have an inner product only between vectors of $𝐻_2$, while the vector of $𝐻_1$ remains unchanged

$⟨2:𝑝′|(|1:𝑛⟩⊗|2:𝑝⟩)=|1:𝑛⟩⊗⟨2:𝑝′|2:𝑝⟩=|1:𝑛⟩⟨2:𝑝′|2:𝑝⟩$.

This is exactly what you should obtain, namely, the second system is traced out by projecting it on $|2:𝑝⟩$, while the first system remains untouched, which is given by the vector $|1:𝑛⟩$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Consider to use MathJax. $\endgroup$ Dec 25, 2022 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ Noted, thanks. @Tobias Fünke $\endgroup$
    – tamih100
    Dec 25, 2022 at 19:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.