1
$\begingroup$

I have a follow-up question from this post: Suppose $$ L\supset \lambda\phi^4 $$

This term is invariant under $\phi\rightarrow-\phi$, Peskin and Schroeder (p.323) said this implies that all amplitudes with an odd number of external legs will vanish. Therefore, the superficial divergent constant could be found as $\omega = 4-b$, where $b = 0,2,4$.

However, I don't quite understand why those amplitudes vanish in the first place. In my last example (linked above), we have
$$ L\supset g\phi^3 $$ (where $L$ is in 6 dimensions), we don't have this symmetry, so there are both odd and even diagrams.

$\endgroup$
0

3 Answers 3

2
$\begingroup$

This can be viewed through the lens of symmetry or simple combinatorics.

  1. States with a definite number of particles can be divided into orthogonal sectors which are respectively even and odd under $\phi\rightarrow -\phi$. These sectors are the eigenspaces of the (idempotent) operator $\hat O : \phi \mapsto -\phi$, with respective eigenvalues $1$ and $-1$. If there are an odd number of external legs, then the incoming and outgoing states belong to different sectors. But since $H_{int} \sim \phi^4$ is invariant under that operation (i.e. it commutes with $\hat O$), then $\hat O H_{int} \hat O = H_{int}$ and so $$\langle f | H_{int}|i\rangle = \langle f|\hat O^2 H_{int} \hat O^2 |i\rangle = (-1) \langle f|\hat O H_{int} \hat O|i\rangle = -\langle f|H_{int} |i\rangle$$ $$\implies \langle f|H_{int} |i\rangle = 0$$ More generally, one can say that if $\hat O$ is a symmetry of the Hamiltonian, then time evolution cannot mix its eigenspaces together (i.e. a state in one eigenspace cannot evolve under $ H_{int}$ into a state in a different eigenspace).

  2. The vertices in $\phi^4$ theory are all of degree $4$, meaning that each vertex is connected to four legs. Each internal leg is connected to two vertices, and each external leg is connected to one; convince yourself that this implies that $$4V = 2I + E$$ where $V,I,$ and $E$ are the numbers of vertices, internal legs, and external legs, respectively. As a trivial result, $E = 4V-2I$ is necessarily even.

Neither one of these explanations works for $\phi^3$, because (1) $[\phi^3, \hat O]\neq 0$ and (2) $E=3V-2I$ does not imply that $E$ must be even.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much for the answer! Is 'sector' the same as 'vector'? $\endgroup$
    – IGY
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 19:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @IGY No, by orthogonal sectors I mean orthogonal subspaces $U$ and $V$ such that the Fock space can be written $F = U\oplus V$. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 20:00
1
$\begingroup$

Your typical diagram is the fourier transform of some quantity like $$\langle \Omega|T\phi(x_1)...\phi(x_n)|\Omega\rangle.$$ Under a parity transform $U$ defined via $$U\phi \ U^{-1}=-\phi,$$ the ground state $|\Omega\rangle$ transforms trivially since the Hamiltonian is invariant.

Thus $$\begin{aligned}\langle \Omega|T\phi(x_1)...\phi(x_n)|\Omega\rangle&=\langle \Omega|U^{-1}UT\phi(x_1)U^{-1}U...\phi(x_n)U^{-1}U|\Omega\rangle \\&=(-1)^n\langle \Omega|T\phi(x_1)...\phi(x_n)|\Omega\rangle\end{aligned},$$ which means that all diagrams with odd $n$ vanish.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much for the answer!! Why the $\phi^3$ term doesn't exclude odd $n$ in this scheme? $\endgroup$
    – IGY
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ Because the groundstate for $\phi^3$ theory is not invariant under $U$ so the above result doesn't apply. $\endgroup$
    – AfterShave
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 23:01
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, is it correct if I write $U|\Omega\rangle = -|\Omega\rangle$, and $\langle\Omega|U^{-1} = -\langle\Omega|$ for $\phi^3$? (and that factor becomes $(-1)^{n+2}$?) $\endgroup$
    – IGY
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ No the groundstate does not transform that way, actually the groundstate doesn't even exist for a purely $\phi^3$ state since the Hamiltonian is not bounded from below. $\endgroup$
    – AfterShave
    Commented Dec 22, 2022 at 0:56
1
$\begingroup$

The point is that there is actually at least two different $\phi^4$ theories:

  1. one $\phi^4$ theory with $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry excluding odd terms.
  2. another $\phi^4$ theory without $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry containing all possible terms.
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much for the answer! 1. What do you mean by 'monomial terms'? 2. Are we usually using the first type of $\phi^4$ theory? $\endgroup$
    – IGY
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 22:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1. I updated the answer. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 23:32
  • $\begingroup$ Just to be extra clear: the difference between these two theories is whether we include a $\phi^3$ term or not (and $\phi$, for tadpoles, if you wish...) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform Thank you!! $\endgroup$
    – IGY
    Commented Dec 22, 2022 at 0:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.