0
$\begingroup$

So I was going through a book of statistical mechanics, but the explanation skipped quite a few steps of the derivation. Given the internal energy: $$ U=k_B\cdot T^2\cdot \frac{\partial ln(Z)}{\partial T} $$ And the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation from classical thermodynamics: $$ U=\left[\frac{\partial\frac{A}{T}}{\partial\frac{1}{T}}\right]_{V,N} $$ How does one arrive to the statistical mechanics definition of the Helmholtz energy (A) given below? $$ A = -k_B\cdot T\cdot ln(Z) $$

Thanks in advance!

[Edit]

I thought it was worth adding, I have tried simplifying the RHS of the Gibbs-Helmholtz relation, and it resulted in the following PDE: $$ U=A-T\cdot\frac{\partial A}{\partial T} $$ But I'm not too sure that is heading in the right direction, or if so I feel like I may be missing something...

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If you just equate the first two lines of your question (I will keep $k_B=1$ for convenience and rename $A=F$ for the reason of habit):

$$T^2 \frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial T} = \frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial (1/T)} = -T^2 \frac{(F/T)}{\partial T}$$

By integrating both sides you can conclude that

$$\ln Z +\mathrm{const} = - F/T $$

Which basically brings you to the sought third line of your question.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Makes quite a lot of sense... Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – HWIK
    Dec 7, 2022 at 15:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.