I'm reading Griffiths' introduction to quantum mechanics. It is explained that solutions to the Schrodinger equation are expressed as linear combinations of separable solutions $\{\psi_n(x)\}$. $$\Psi(x,0)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_n\psi_n(x)e^{-i\frac{E_n}{\hbar}t}$$ While I understand that $c_n$ represents the wavefunction's initial conditions at $t=0$, its analogue in the case of a free particle $\phi(k)$ baffles me.

Correct me if I'm wrong. According to Griffiths, the transition from $$\Psi_k(x,t)=A\exp\bigg[i\bigg(kx-\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t\bigg)\bigg]\implies\Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\phi(k)\exp\bigg[i\bigg(kx-\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}t\bigg)\bigg]dk$$ is written in a way so that the $\Psi(x,t)$ is now normalizable. However, the free particle cannot exist in a stationary state and, hence, no longer has a definite energy, so each term does not represent anything physical since $k$ is continuous.

My question is: can someone can clarify why this integral is evaluated with respect to $k$ instead of $x$ unless Plancherel's theorem is applied for $\phi(k)$? $$\phi(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx$$

My other question is can someone explain where the constant $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$ comes from in the following analogue (I'm not that familiar with Fourier analysis)? $$c_n\rightarrow\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\phi(k)$$


1 Answer 1


Interpreting the Fourier transform as an expansion in a basis

Ignore the time-dependence for the moment. Some pure maths stuffs from Fourier analysis allows us to write any square-integrable function $f(x)$ in the form $$ f(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\tilde{f}(k)\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\tilde{f}(k)\psi_k(x)\,, $$ where $$ \tilde{f}(k) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \,f(x)\frac{e^{-ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,\psi_k^*(x){f}(x)\,. $$ This is essentially a statement of Plancherel's theorem. Now, we can come to a linear-algebraic interpretation of these two statements by comparing what we've done to the case for for discrete (or even finite-dimensional) spaces. The idea is that we interpret the first integral as an expansion in a basis (the basis being the free-particle eigenstates, which are plane waves) and the second integral as the formula for computing these coefficients. (There really is a dual relationship here, though, in the sense that we can just as easily interpret them in the opposite way, with the second being an expansion in a basis and the first being the coefficients, but leave that be for now.)

Here is the comparison. For the case of a discrete basis, we have a set of normalized basis functions $\psi_n(x)$, and we can expand an arbitrary square-integrable function $f$ as a linear combination $$ f(x) = \sum_n c_n\psi_n(x)\,, $$ where $$ c_n = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\, \psi_n^*(x)f(x)\,. $$ We compare directly the forms as follows: \begin{align*} \begin{array}{ccccc} f(x) & =& \displaystyle\int_{\infty}^{\infty} dk & \tilde{f}(k) & \psi_k(x)\\[1em] f(x) & =& \displaystyle\sum_n & c_n & \psi_n(x) \end{array} \end{align*} and \begin{align*} \begin{array}{ccccc} \tilde{f}(k)& =& \displaystyle\int_{\infty}^{\infty} dx & \psi_k^*(x) & f(x)\\[1em] c_n & =&\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx & \psi_n^*(x) & {f}(x) \end{array} \end{align*} We can see that the sum over $k$ corresponds to the sum over $n$, the function $\tilde{f}(k)$ corresponds to $c_n$ (so really it's an expansion coefficient), and the basis function $\psi_k(x)=\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$ corresponds to the basis element $\psi_n(x)$. This should make the correspondence clear. The first set of expressions represent expansions of $f$ in an "orthonormal basis", and the second set of expressions represent the computation of the expansion coefficients. (Note importantly that the factor of $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$ is not grouped with the expansion coefficient but instead goes along with the complex exponential! The reason why we group the $\sqrt{2\pi}$ together with the exponential will be explained below.)

The expansion of an initial state in the energy-eigenbasis of the free-particle

Now, suppose we are considering a free-particle system, in which case the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are given by $$ \psi_k(x) = \frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,, $$ where the corresponding eigenvalue is indexed by $k$ and is given by $$ E_k=\frac{\hbar^2k}{2m}\,. $$ These are states of well-defined and definite energy (modulo the problem of them being non-normalized, but deal with that later). According to the prescription for how we solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, given an initial state $\Psi(x,0)$, we expand it in the energy eigenstates as $$ \Psi(x,0) = {"{\sum_k}"}c_k \psi_k(x)\,, $$ and tack on the time-dependence in the usual way to get $$ \Psi(x,t) = {"{\sum_k}"}c_k \psi_k(x)e^{-iE_kt/\hbar}\,. $$ However, we don't have a discrete basis, so what really have is $$ \Psi(x,0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\tilde{\Psi}(k,0)\psi_k(x) \Longrightarrow \Psi(x,0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\tilde{\Psi}(k,0)\psi_k(x)e^{-iE_kt/\hbar}\, $$ where $E_k$ is as above and $\tilde{\Psi}(k,0)$ is computed as explained above. (As a matter of notation, I have used $\tilde{\Psi}(k,0)$ for what the OP--and Griffiths--calls $\phi(k)$ in order to make it clear that this "function" is really the set of expansion coefficients of the state $\Psi(x,0)$ in the free-particle basis.) This reduces to the OP's--and Griffith's--expression if we plug in $\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$ for $\psi_k(x)$.

The choice of normalization

The reason that the $\sqrt{2\pi}$ is there is to ensure that the state is "normalized" in the continuous-variable sense. That is, since $$ \delta(k-k') = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,\frac{e^{-i(k-k')x}}{2\pi}\,, $$ is a representation of the Dirac-delta function, then we can write that the inner product of two such free-particle eigenstates is $$ \langle\psi_{k}|\psi_{k'}\rangle =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,\psi_k^*(x)\psi_{k'}(x) =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,\left(\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\right)^*\frac{e^{ik'x}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,\frac{e^{-i(k-k')x}}{2\pi} =\delta(k-k')\,. $$ Similarly, $$ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\frac{e^{i(x-x')k}}{2\pi} =\delta(x-x')\,. $$ Using this, we can write \begin{align*} f(x) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx'\,\delta(x-x') f(x') = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx'\,\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\frac{e^{i(x-x')k}}{2\pi}f(x') \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx'\,\frac{e^{-ikx'}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}f(x') \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx'\,\psi_k^*(x')f(x') \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\frac{e^{ikx}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\tilde{f}(k) \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\,\tilde{f}(k)\psi_k(x)\,. \end{align*} Thus, the "justification"/"derivation" of the Fourier transform and its inverse, and the choice for where the $\sqrt{2\pi}$ goes.

But, one more thing. That choice of where the $\sqrt{2\pi}$ goes has the following consequence. It guarantees that if $f(x)$ is normalized in $x$-space, $\tilde{f}(k)$ is normalized in $k$-space! This allows us to interpret $\tilde{f}(k)$ as the momentum-space representation of the wave function (once we've identified $p=\hbar k$), which is a representation of the wave function that reveals momentum information about the state in the same way that the position-space wave function reveals position information. To be explicit, $|f(x)|^2dx$ is the probability that when we measure the position of the particle, we get the result that it is in the interval $[x,x+dx]$, and so $|\tilde{f}(k)|^2dk$ is the probability that when we measure the momentum of the particle, we get the result that it is in the interval $[\hbar k,\hbar k+\hbar dk]$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.