0
$\begingroup$

This is probably extremely elementary, but I am not sure how to look for an answer online. I'm reading a physics text that uses the following notation for a doublet of particles:

$$q_L \rightarrow (3,2)_{1/6}$$

What does this notation mean? I have been able to deduce that the subindex $1/6$ is the weak hypercharge $Y$. But what about the numbers between the parentheses? The text then proceeds to calculate the charge of the doublet as:

$$Q=T^3+Y$$

but as far as I know, $T^3$ should be $T_3$, the third component of the isospin, right? How should this be computed based on that notation?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I'm reading a physics text Which one? $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Nov 27, 2022 at 18:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Ghoster the class notes of a physics professor at my university. They are not available online so I can't link them here, and the professor has since retired, so I don't feel comfortable emailing him to ask about this. I'm getting into particle physics coming from a pure mathematics background, so I'm using all kinds of materials I can find to try and learn quantum field theory by myself before starting my PhD. This is why I'm a bit lost when it comes to some elementary stuff, sadly. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 27, 2022 at 19:00

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Try a standard mainstream QFT & SM text. They all explain this.

The notation $(3,2)_{1/6}$ denotes the dimensionalities of the representations of your particle under SU(3)×SU(2), respectively, in the parenthesis, and the eigenvalue of the hypercharge U(1) as a subscript. So, the 2 here means doublet: weak isospin 1/2, acted upon by 2$\times$2 matrices.

Indeed, in your normalization for the weak hypercharge (it is not unique!), $Q=T_3+Y$, so that, for the left-chiral quarks of the SM, the weak doublet is $$ u \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0\end{pmatrix} , \qquad d \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1\end{pmatrix}, $$ so that, for $T_3=\operatorname{diag}(1/2,-1/2)$ , $$ Qu=(1/2 + 1/6)u= 2/3 ~ u, \qquad Qd= (-1/2+1/6)d= -1/3~ d. $$

For the right-chiral quarks, the reps are $(3,1)_{2/3}$ and $(3,1)_{-1/3}$ respectively. The Higgs isodoublet presents as $(1,2)_{1/2}$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ So, as far as I understand, the value of the charge $Q$ depends only on $Y$, since $T_3$ is always equal to the same matrix, $T_3=diag(1/2,-1/2)$. Right? I'm a bit confused, since I thought $T_3$ was the third component of the isospin, but here it appears to be one of the generators of the $SU(3)$ group. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2022 at 11:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Correct, for left-chiral fermions (doublets), but not for right-chiral singlets, where $T_3=0$. I am baffled by your unsound "appears". It has nothing to do with the SU(3) group, which is a red herring here: color commutes with the SU(2), the U(1), and therefore charge. It is there for completeness of description, a completely inert bystander in your context. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2022 at 12:08
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain how do I know the value of $T_3$ from this type of notation? I think it's the only thing I'm missing here. How to know if I'm dealing with a doublet or a singlet? Sorry if it's a very basic question. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2022 at 12:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The 2 in the second spot in the parenthesis says SU(2) doublet. The 1 says singlet. So in the first case $T_3$ is a diagonal matrix, and in the second trivial. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.