1
$\begingroup$

In Peeble's "Large scale structure of the Universe" the Newtonian approximation in cosmology is examined by looking at a transformation that makes the metric locally Minkowski. On pg 38 it is stated that

To make $g_{ij,kl}=0$, we would add 10$\times$10 equations for a total of 150 to be satisfied by the choice of 56+80=136 transformations.

The 56 is explained a couple of lines earlier but I am having trouble seeing where the 80 comes from. I would very much appreciate any help with how to derive that an additional 80 transformations are needed in the above quote.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

During coordinate transformation $x^i(y^j)$ the change of components of metric is expressed through first derivatives $\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial y^j}$, first derivatives of metric $g_{ij,k}$ will contain the second derivatives of $x^i$, while expression for the second metric derivatives will contain the third derivatives of $x^i$.

So, 80 is the number of third derivatives $$\frac{\partial ^3 x^i}{\partial y^j \partial y^k \partial y^l} $$ involved in varying the second derivatives of metric $g_{ij,kl}$ during coordinate transformations $x^i(y^j)$.

It is composed as $80 = 4 \times 20 $, where 4 is the number of values for index $i$ in numerator, while 20 is the number of unordered triples $\{j,k,l\}$ of indices in denominator. In turn $20=4+4\times 3 + 4$, first term is the number of triples with all indices identical, second -- with two identical indices and third with all three indices distinct.

So, by choosing coordinate transformation $x^i(y^j)$ we could make the metric locally Minkowskian ($g_{ij}(x^i_0)=\eta_{ij}$) and also turn the first derivatives of metric to zero ($g_{ij,k}=0$). However we cannot generally also turn second derivatives to zero.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.