0
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to understand the physical significance/interpretation of the various parts of the stress-energy-momentum tensor. The book I'm using is The Classical Theory of Fields, by Landau and Lifshitz.

On page 80 of my edition (requires login):

https://archive.org/details/classicaltheoryo0000land_k6k2/page/80/mode/2up?view=theater

there seems to be an error in this remark, but I'm not 100% certain:

Thus we arrive at the important conclusion that the requirements of relativistic invariance, as expressed by the tensor character of the quantities Tik, automatically lead to a definite connection between the energy flux and the momentum flux: the energy flux density is equal to the momentum flux density multiplied by c^2.

As I read it, both items which I rendered in bold in the above quote should be changed to read momentum density. Am I correct, or have I strayed into the wilderness?

Please note that in the text the momentum density is noted on the page previous to the one cited above, page 79:

https://archive.org/details/classicaltheoryo0000land_k6k2/page/78/mode/2up?view=theater

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You're correct; looking at the 2000 edition on Amazon (page 85 by searching for momentum density in the Look Inside feature) that section has been updated to read momentum density.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.