1
$\begingroup$

Bloch's theorem states that in the presence of a periodic potential solutions to the Schrödinger equation take the following form:

$$Ψ(k) = exp(ik•r)*u(k)$$

I am trying to show that using this ansatz results in the Bloch equation $$H(k)u(k) = E(k)u(k)$$ but something is lost upon me...

I tried using the Bloch Hamiltonian in the following way:

$$H(k) = exp(ik•r)*H*exp(-ik•r))$$

Time independent Schrödinger equation is:

$$HΨ = EΨ$$

giving

$$[exp(ik•r)*H*exp(-ik•r)][exp(ik•r)*u(k)] = E[exp(ik•r)*u(k)]$$

simplifying to

$$exp(ik•r)*H*u(k) = E[exp(ik•r)*u(k)]$$

From here can I "pull out" the exp(ik•r) term to cancel them? It doesn't feel right. Please point me in the right direction... resources would be immensely helpful!

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

A couple of remarks are in order. The periodic potential is periodic in space typically, since $V \equiv V(r)$. In other words, we start with knowing that $V(r) = V(r + R)$ for some $R \in \mathbb{R}$. Then Bloch's Theorem states that, $$ \begin{equation} \psi_k(r) = e^{ikr}u_k(r) \end{equation} $$ are the solutions to the Schrödinger equation with $u_k(r) = u_k(r+R)$. These solutions are called Bloch functions. Such a situation may be observed in a perfect crystal, where the periodicity would correspond to its atomic structure. As to why I restate the Theorem in position space instead of momentum is because the Bloch functions $\psi_k(r)$ aren't generally periodic in the reciprocal space. More details on that in the answer here.

Now, applying the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation $H\psi_k(r) = E_k \psi_k(r)$ to the Bloch function, we get $$ \begin{equation} H_k u_k(r) = \left[ \frac{p^{2}_{eff}}{2m} + V(r) \right] u_k(r) = E_k u_k(r) \end{equation} $$ where, $p_{eff} := -i\hbar\partial_r + \hbar k$. In the context of a crystal, one may identify this effective momentum as the crystal momentum $\hbar k$ (a quasimomentum really) added to the usual momentum operator $-i\hbar\partial_r$. I leave the proof to you as an exercise.

Side-note: There's nothing wrong with pushing out the translation operator $T_r = e^{ikr}$ to one side in your equations, so long as it commutes (must take care of -ve signs if it anticommutes) with the operators that you're pushing them through. In fact, for a perfect crystal with period $R$, we must have $[H, T_R] = 0$. As far as cancellations go, since $T_r$ is unitary, all you have to do is (pre/post-)multiply by the adjoint $T^{\dagger}_{r}$ on both sides after pushing out $T_r$ to the same end of either side.

PS: My descriptions are for a 1D case. The generalisation to higher dimensions is straightforward if necessary.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.