This question already has an answer here:

I'm not sure if this is an acceptable place to ask this question, as it may have more to do with the biological workings of human eyes than with the physical properties of light, but I'd rather hear a physical explanation than a biological one (if one exists).

Essentially, we often describe the visible spectrum with a color wheel. In this wheel, Red appears next to Purple (violet), but Red and Violet are at opposite ends of the visible light spectrum. What accounts for this? That is, why do we perceive the Visible Light Spectrum as circular, instead of linear?


marked as duplicate by Ben Crowell, Qmechanic Aug 14 '13 at 18:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ You might find this interesting. youtube.com/watch?v=S9dqJRyk0YM $\endgroup$ – joshphysics Aug 2 '13 at 19:16
  • $\begingroup$ @joshphysics I actually had seen that video (though didn't remember it). Henry's video was entertaining, but I don't think it really gave an insight as to why we roll up all the "left over" light into pink. Furthermore, it didn't even attempt to say why rolling up the electromagnetic spectrum makes any sense. Why should EM radiation with the shortest imaginable wavelength be anything like EM radiation with the longest imaginable wavelength? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Rosenthal Aug 2 '13 at 19:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ duplicate of physics.stackexchange.com/q/40763 $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Aug 14 '13 at 14:12

I think saying that the visible light spectrum itself appears circular is a bit misleading. We simply often choose to represent a wide gamut of colors that humans can perceive in the form of a wheel because such a wheel is an intuitive representation with interesting properties. In particular, for example, the RGB color wheel can help one get an intuitive feel for how humans perceive color.

Humans are trichromats which means that we see color by processing information from three different color channels. Specifically, we have three different types of cone cells, each of which sends a signal to our brain, and those signals are processed by our brain yielding a perceived color. As a result, perceived human color is a function $f(S,M,L)$ of the response values $S$, $M$, and $L$ of the so-called "$S$hort," "$M$edium," and "$L$ong" cones. The cones are given these names because the short cone has a peak response at relatively short wavelengths of incoming light (blue), the medium cone has a peak response at medium wavelengths, etc.

What does this have to do with the color wheel? Well, one way to think of a color wheel is that it's a convenient representation of colors you would see upon combining different amounts of three primary colors additively in much the same way that the human eye generates color perception by combining the outputs of your three cones.

Take the RGB color model for example. Roughly speaking, if you were to shine about the same amounts of blue and red light onto a white screen, then when the resulting light hit your eye, your cones would respond in such a way that the signal sent to your brain would result in seeing magenta. If you were to do the same thing with red and green, you would see yellow. If you look at the RGB color wheel, you can see that the wheel displays this fact nicely because the color you see when you combine other colors is placed in between the colors you are combining.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.