There is a website many schools will use to show their students job descriptions to give them inspiration and know what they wish to be when they grow up, show them some options, you know?
Well, I was looking at the importance of skills section for Astronomers, and they had:
100% Mathematics
98% Physics
... etcetera.
This got me thinking about how important it is, being that they have the word "Physics" in the title of "Astrophysics". Anyway, eventually I thought "well, you have to get a bachelor's in physics to be considered a physicist, and you pretty much have to take a master's in physics to get close to an Astronomer, so are all Astronomers, technically able to be called Physicists too?"
Please let me know, because it would be kind of funny (in my opinion), to be able to look at a really, really helpful scientist, and while ignoring their actual title say, "Physicist all the way!".
I'd like to mention, I would never actually call them this, without knowing them personally. It is degenerate. I ask purely out of curiosity, since I've seen no reason for it to not technically be correct.